Is blood pressure control to less than 140/less than 90 mmHg in 50% of all hypertensive patients as good as we can do in the USA: or is this as good as it gets?
- PMID: 21597369
- DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283474c20
Is blood pressure control to less than 140/less than 90 mmHg in 50% of all hypertensive patients as good as we can do in the USA: or is this as good as it gets?
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review assesses whether controlling hypertension in 50% of all patients is the best we can do.
Recent findings: NHANES 2007-2008 data show that blood pressure was controlled to less than 140/less than 90 mmHg in 50% of all hypertensive patients, an increase from 27% in 1988-1994. The 50% control rate reflects the product of 72.5% of all patients treated and 69% of all treated patients controlled. However, there are opportunities for improvement, as 27.5% of all hypertensives, or 55% of uncontrolled patients, were untreated in 2007-2008. These individuals are disproportionately younger, men, and Hispanic. Moreover, 31% of all treated hypertensives, or 45% of uncontrolled patients, have blood pressure of at least 140/at least 90 mmHg. They are disproportionately older, women, and black.
Summary: Initiatives to raise hypertension treatment from 72.5% in 2007-2008 to 87.5% in the future are conceivable by targeting unaware and untreated patient groups and engaging them in ongoing healthcare. This could improve hypertension control by an absolute 10% of all patients. Reducing therapeutic inertia and increasing therapeutic efficiency could raise the proportion of patients on treatment who are controlled from 69 to 80% and could increase hypertension control by 8%. Combining these approaches could raise hypertension control to 70% of all hypertensive adults in the USA.
Similar articles
-
Lack of control of high blood pressure and treatment recommendations in Canada.Can J Cardiol. 2002 Jun;18(6):657-61. Can J Cardiol. 2002. PMID: 12107423
-
Gender differences in hypertension treatment, drug utilization patterns, and blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004.Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jul;21(7):789-98. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.185. Epub 2008 May 1. Am J Hypertens. 2008. PMID: 18451806
-
Treatment of hypertension in Finnish general practice seems unsatisfactory despite evidence-based guidelines.Blood Press. 2009;18(1-2):62-7. doi: 10.1080/08037050902840631. Blood Press. 2009. PMID: 19353413
-
Overcoming therapeutic inertia in patients with hypertension.Postgrad Med. 2010 Jan;122(1):118-24. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.01.2105. Postgrad Med. 2010. PMID: 20107295 Review.
-
Actual blood pressure control: are we doing things right?J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Jan;16(1):S45-51. J Hypertens Suppl. 1998. PMID: 9534097 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating factors associated with uncontrolled hypertension: Isfahan cohort study, Iran.ARYA Atheroscler. 2014 Nov;10(6):311-8. ARYA Atheroscler. 2014. PMID: 25815021 Free PMC article.
-
Bioactive lipids in hypertension.Adv Pharmacol. 2023;97:1-35. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 May 10. Adv Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37236756 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of hypertension among African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Jun;15(6):367-74. doi: 10.1111/jch.12088. Epub 2013 Apr 1. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013. PMID: 23730984 Free PMC article.
-
Orally active epoxyeicosatrienoic acid analogs in hypertension and renal injury.Adv Pharmacol. 2022;94:27-55. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Mar 30. Adv Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35659375 Free PMC article.
-
Formation of community-based hypertension practice networks: success, obstacles, and lessons learned.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Jun;16(6):393-7. doi: 10.1111/jch.12310. Epub 2014 Mar 26. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014. PMID: 24666425 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials