Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep;14(3):284-94.
doi: 10.1007/s11102-011-0310-7.

Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control

Affiliations
Review

Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control

A Ben-Shlomo et al. Pituitary. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Although acromegaly is a rare disease, the clinical, economic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden is considerable due to the broad spectrum of comorbidities as well as the need for lifelong management. We performed a comprehensive literature review of the past 12 years (1998-2010) to determine the benefit of disease control (defined as a growth hormone [GH] concentration <2.5 μg/l and insulin-like growth factor [IGF]-1 normal for age) on clinical, HRQoL, and economic outcomes. Increased GH and IGF-1 levels and low frequency of somatostatin analogue use directly predicted increased mortality risk. Clinical outcome measures that may improve with disease control include joint articular cartilage thickness, vertebral fractures, left ventricular function, exercise capacity and endurance, lipid profile, and obstructive apnea events. Some evidence suggests an association between controlled disease and improved HRQoL. Total direct treatment costs were higher for patients with uncontrolled compared to controlled disease. Costs incurred for management of comorbidities, and indirect cost could further add to treatment costs. Optimizing disease control in patients with acromegaly appears to improve outcomes. Future studies need to evaluate clinical outcomes, as well as HRQoL and comprehensive economic outcomes achieved with controlled disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This research was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Acromegaly and mortality: observed deaths in acromegaly versus expected deaths in general population [23, 24]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of joint articular cartilage thickness in patients with controlled acromegaly, uncontrolled acromegaly, and no acromegaly. Adapted from Colao et al. [31]. © European Society of Endocrinology. Reproduced by permission
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Conceptual model of the value of disease control in acromegaly

References

    1. Melmed S (2006) Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med 355:2558–2573 - PubMed
    1. Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya C (1999) Epidemiology of acromegaly. Pituitary 2:29–41 - PubMed
    1. Reddy R, Hope S, Wass J (2010) Acromegaly. BMJ 341:c4189 - PubMed
    1. Nachtigall L, Delgado A, Swearingen B, Lee H, Zerikly R, Klibanski A (2008) Changing patterns in diagnosis and therapy of acromegaly over two decades. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2035–2041 - PubMed
    1. Drange MR, Fram NR, Herman-Bonert V, Melmed S (2000) Pituitary tumor registry: a novel clinical resource. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:168–174 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms