Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;3(3):e140-7.
Epub 2009 Aug 11.

Papanicolaou test utilization and frequency of screening opportunities among women diagnosed with cervical cancer

Papanicolaou test utilization and frequency of screening opportunities among women diagnosed with cervical cancer

Kathleen Decker et al. Open Med. 2009.

Abstract

Background: Although the importance of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test screening in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer is well established, in 1994-95 one in 4 women in Manitoba aged 18 to 69 years reported never having had a Pap test or not having had a Pap test in the last 3 years. The objectives of this study were to examine the screening history of women in Manitoba diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer and to explore whether opportunities for screening were missed.

Methods: In this case-control study women aged 18 years and older who resided in Manitoba and were diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 1989 and 2001 were each matched by age and area of residence to 5 controls, (N = 4009). Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between Pap test utilization and the likelihood of diagnosis with invasive cervical cancer. Generalized linear models using the negative binomial distribution were used to assess the association between cancer status and rates of prior Pap testing and of opportunities to be screened. Logistic generalized estimating equation models were used for the analysis of physician characteristics.

Results: Forty-six percent of women in Manitoba diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer and 67% of the control group had received a Pap test in the 5 years before the case's diagnosis. After adjustment for age, income and residence, the rate of Pap testing was significantly higher in the control group (rate ratio [RR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-1.73). Conversely, when cervical cancer was the outcome, women who had not had Pap tests were more likely to be diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 2.77, 95% CI 2.30-3.30) than women who did have a Pap test. Although women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer had fewer Pap tests, they had had as many opportunities to be screened as controls (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.12). Compared with urban family physicians, rural family physicians were less likely to provide Pap tests (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.80) and specialists were more likely to provide Pap tests (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.30-2.22).

Conclusions: Women who were diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer in the province of Manitoba, Canada, had fewer Pap tests but the same frequency of opportunities to be screened as matched controls. These results reinforce the need to educate women about cervical cancer screening and the importance of receiving Pap tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Table 1
Table 1
Characteristics and Pap test utilization of study participants in the 5-year period before diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer (N = 4009)
Table 2
Table 2
Adjusted rate ratios of Pap tests in the 5-year period before diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer
Table 3
Table 3
Adjusted odds ratios of being diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer*
Table 4
Table 4
Adjusted rate ratios of the opportunity to be screened in the 5-year period before diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer
Table 5
Table 5
Adjusted odds ratios of the likelihood of a Pap test, by physician characteristic, in the 5-year period before diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer

References

    1. Liu S, Semenciw R, Probert A, Mao Y. Cervical cancer in Canada: changing patterns in incidence and mortality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11(1):24–31. - PubMed
    1. Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1941;42(2):193–206. - PubMed
    1. Lee J, Parsons G F, Gentleman J F. Falling short of Pap test guidelines. Health Rep. 1998;10(1):9–19. - PubMed
    1. Roos L L, Traverse D, Turner D. Delivering prevention: the role of public programs in delivering care to high-risk populations. Med Care. 1999;37(6 Suppl):JS264–JS278. - PubMed
    1. Coughlin S S, Uhler R J. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States, 1994-1997. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9(6):597–603. http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10868695. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources