Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011;6(5):e19252.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019252. Epub 2011 May 16.

In vivo electroporation enhances the immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate in healthy volunteers

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

In vivo electroporation enhances the immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate in healthy volunteers

Sandhya Vasan et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Background: DNA-based vaccines have been safe but weakly immunogenic in humans to date.

Methods and findings: We sought to determine the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of ADVAX, a multigenic HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate, injected intramuscularly by in vivo electroporation (EP) in a Phase-1, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial in healthy volunteers. Eight volunteers each received 0.2 mg, 1 mg, or 4 mg ADVAX or saline placebo via EP, or 4 mg ADVAX via standard intramuscular injection at weeks 0 and 8. A third vaccination was administered to eleven volunteers at week 36. EP was safe, well-tolerated and considered acceptable for a prophylactic vaccine. EP delivery of ADVAX increased the magnitude of HIV-1-specific cell mediated immunity by up to 70-fold over IM injection, as measured by gamma interferon ELISpot. The number of antigens to which the response was detected improved with EP and increasing dosage. Intracellular cytokine staining analysis of ELISpot responders revealed both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses, with co-secretion of multiple cytokines.

Conclusions: This is the first demonstration in healthy volunteers that EP is safe, tolerable, and effective in improving the magnitude, breadth and durability of cellular immune responses to a DNA vaccine candidate.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00545987.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: D. Hannaman and R. Bernard are employees of Ichor Medical Systems, Inc, manufacturer of the TriGridTM device. These authors had a direct role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. Len Dally and Carol Smith are employed by The EMMES Corporation. All other authors have no competing financial interests. The competeing interests of Ichor Medical Systems and the EMMES Corporation do not alter the authors' adherance to all PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Participant Flow Diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Tolerability and Acceptability of Electroporation.
Volunteers randomized to receive ADVAX or placebo via EP completed a questionnaire to rate the tolerability of the procedure on a 5 point pain scale at three different time points during and after EP (Panel A), and the acceptability of the procedure for future vaccination (Panel B). Results represent a total of 75 responses from 32 volunteers.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cellular Immune Response.
Panel A depicts the fold increase over the HD-IM response in the mean of all IFNγ ELISpot responses to each antigen at Week 10, coinciding with the peak cellular immune response. Panel B depicts the sum of all mean ELISpot counts for each peptide pool at each study time point for all ADVAX dose groups, color coded by antigen. SFU  =  spot forming units.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Individual IFNγ ELISpot Responses.
All individual background-subtracted IFNγ ELISpot counts to each antigen at study Week 10, the peak response after the second administration. Horizontal lines indicate median values for each group. P-values indicate pair-wise comparisons of the three EP responses with HD-IM responses using the non-parametric Wilcoxon 2-sample test (t approximation). Significance is set at p<0.017, since there are 3 tests per antigen. Significant p values are depicted. SFU  =  spot forming units.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ulmer JB, Donnelly JJ, Parker SE, Rhodes GH, Felgner PL, et al. Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein. Science. 1993;259:1745–1749. - PubMed
    1. Donnelly JJ, Wahren B, Liu MA. DNA vaccines: progress and challenges. J Immunol. 2005;175(2):633–639. - PubMed
    1. Rice J, Ottensmeier CH, Stevenson FK. DNA vaccines: precision tools for activating effective immunity against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:108–120. - PubMed
    1. Wang R, Doolan DL, Le TP, Hedstrom RC, Coonan KM, et al. Induction of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in humans by a malaria DNA vaccine. Science. 1998;282:476–480. - PubMed
    1. Rottinghaus ST, Poland GA, Jacobson RM, Barr LJ, Roy MJ. epatitis DNA vaccine induces protective antibody responses in human nonresponders to conventional vaccination. Vaccine. 2003;21:4604–4608. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data