Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;13(4):248-50.
doi: 10.1007/s11920-011-0207-1.

Meta-structure issues for the DSM-5: how do anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, post-traumatic disorders, and dissociative disorders fit together?

Affiliations

Meta-structure issues for the DSM-5: how do anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, post-traumatic disorders, and dissociative disorders fit together?

Dan J Stein et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

The question of how to optimally organize into chapters and label the different categories of mental disorders is an important one for DSM-5 and ICD-11. The grouping of mental disorders, or meta-structure, should arguably reflect knowledge on the validity of different conditions and their relationships, and should ideally contribute to improving the clinical utility of the nosology by guiding clinical assessment and management. The DSM-5 Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum, Posttraumatic, and Dissociative Disorders Workgroup has reviewed the nature of anxiety disorders, the possibility of including a new category of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders in the DSM-5, and the concept of traumatic stress disorders. It is difficult to devise a perfect nosology that dissects nature at her joints; instead, any particular approach to the meta-structure would seem to have pros and cons that must be carefully weighed. Despite the imperfections of any meta-structure, we are hopeful that each revision of the nosology will bring with it greater diagnostic validity and clinical utility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Psychol Med. 2009 Dec;39(12):1993-2000 - PubMed
    1. Depress Anxiety. 2010 Jun;27(6):495-506 - PubMed
    1. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Dec;18(4):189-203 - PubMed
    1. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(12):1066-85 - PubMed
    1. Depress Anxiety. 2011 Sep;28(9):737-49 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms