Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep;43(9):683-9.
doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.582247. Epub 2011 May 23.

Vaccine herd effect

Tae Hyong Kim  1 , Jennie Johnstone, Mark Loeb
Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Vaccine herd effect

Tae Hyong Kim et al. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011 Sep.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Vaccination ideally protects susceptible populations at high risk for complications of the infection. However, vaccines for these subgroups do not always provide sufficient effectiveness. The herd effect or herd immunity is an attractive way to extend vaccine benefits beyond the directly targeted population. It refers to the indirect protection of unvaccinated persons, whereby an increase in the prevalence of immunity by the vaccine prevents circulation of infectious agents in susceptible populations. The herd effect has had a major impact in the eradication of smallpox, has reduced transmission of pertussis, and protects against influenza and pneumococcal disease. A high uptake of vaccines is generally needed for success. In this paper we aim to provide an update review on the herd effect, focusing on the clinical benefit, by reviewing data for specific vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic presentation of the herd effect: The index patient transmits an infectious agent to a given number (basic reproductive number R0) of susceptible persons in the community. Black circles are infected persons and white circles are uninfected susceptible persons (panel A). After a mass immunization programme in the community (panel B), a proportion of the population is immunized (grey circles with ‘I’), thus directly protected from the infectious agent (direct effect). The immunized individuals further protect the susceptible population (white circles with ‘H’) by stopping the transmission within the social networks. This extra protection effect provided by a vaccine is called ‘herd immunity’.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The vaccine herd effect on Haemophilus influenzae type b diseases in Finland after introduction of the Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine in 1986 (adapted from Peltola et al. [5]).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The vaccine herd effect on invasive pneumococcal diseases in the USA after introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children aged < 2 y in 2000 (adapted from Whitney et al. [21]).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The vaccine herd effect on influenza in a randomized control trial in Canada (adapted from Loeb et al. [32]).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Halloran ME, Haber M, Longini IM, Jr, Struchiner CJ. Direct and indirect effects in vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:323–31. - PubMed
    1. Lane JM. Mass vaccination and surveillance/containment in the eradication of smallpox. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol. 2006;304:17–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ortega-Sanchez IR, Meltzer MI, Shepard C, Zell E, Messonnier ML, Bilukha O, et al. Economics of an adolescent meningococcal conjugate vaccination catch-up campaign in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1–13. - PubMed
    1. Ray GT, Whitney CG, Fireman BH, Ciuryla V, Black SB. Cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: evidence from the first 5 years of use in the United States incorporating herd effects. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:494–501. - PubMed
    1. Peltola H, Aavitsland P, Hansen KG, Jonsdottir KE, Nokleby H, Romanus V. A five-country analysis of the impact of four different Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugates and vaccination strategies in Scandinavia. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:223–9. - PubMed