Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:5:527-33.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S18565. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma

Affiliations

Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma

Leo de Jong et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011.

Abstract

Background: This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery.

Methods: Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received either the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device or underwent a trabeculectomy were followed for up to an additional four years (five total) beyond the original study (39 eyes per treatment group). Risk-benefit data were obtained for up to five years after glaucoma surgery. Outcome variables were intraocular pressures and intraocular pressure medications. Complete success was denoted by intraocular pressure values ≤ 18 mmHg without medication.

Results: The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device controlled intraocular pressure more effectively without medication for more patients from year 1 (86.8% versus 61.5%, P = 0.01) to year 3 (66.7% versus 41.0%, P = 0.02) than trabeculectomy. At year 1, only 12.8% of patients required intraocular pressure medication after EX-PRESS implantation, compared with 35.9% after trabeculectomy. The proportions became closer at year 5 (41% versus 53.9%). The responder rate was higher with EX-PRESS and time to failure was longer. In addition, surgical interventions for complications were fewer after EX-PRESS implantation.

Conclusion: This five-year analysis confirmed and extended the results reported after one year. Compared with trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS provided better intraocular pressure control in the first three years, and patients required fewer intraocular pressure medications and fewer surgical interventions during the five-year study period. For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device, implanted under a superficial scleral flap, produced significantly higher success rates than trabeculectomy. EX-PRESS is an effective device for long-term treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Keywords: glaucoma filtration device; intraocular pressure; medication; primary open-angle glaucoma; trabeculectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival curves comparing Ex-PRESS implants with trabeculectomy. A) Kaplan–Meier life table curves of complete success (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg): no IOP medication or subsequent glaucoma surgery (log-rank, p = 0.0049). B) Kaplan–Meier life table curves of partial success (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg), i.e. including IOP medication: no subsequent glaucoma surgery (log-rank, p = 0.0085). C) Kaplan–Meier life table curves for marginal success (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg) incorporating IOP medication and subsequent glaucoma surgery (log-rank, p = 0.18). D) Kaplan–Meier life table curves of complete success (IOP ≤ 15 mmHg): no IOP medication or subsequent glaucoma surgery (log-rank, p = 0.0014). E) Kaplan–Meier life table curves of partial success (IOP ≤ 15 mmHg) i.e. including IOP medication: no subsequent glaucoma surgery (log-rank, p = 0.0026). F) Kaplan–Meier life table curves of partial success (IOP ≤ 15 mmHg) i.e. including IOP medication: no subsequent glaucoma surgery (log-rank, p = 0.0026).

References

    1. Henson DB, Thampy R. Preventing blindness from glaucoma. BMJ. 2005;331(7509):120–121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):887–888. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caprioli J, Coleman AL. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1123–1129. - PubMed
    1. Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK, 2nd, Wilson MR, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714–720. - PubMed