Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 7:1:115.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2010.00115. eCollection 2010.

How to assess the value of medicines?

Affiliations

How to assess the value of medicines?

Steven Simoens. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

This study aims to discuss approaches to assessing the value of medicines. Economic evaluation assesses value by means of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Health is maximized by selecting medicines with increasing ICERs until the budget is exhausted. The budget size determines the value of the threshold ICER and vice versa. Alternatively, the threshold value can be inferred from pricing/reimbursement decisions, although such values vary between countries. Threshold values derived from the value-of-life literature depend on the technique used. The World Health Organization has proposed a threshold value tied to the national GDP. As decision makers may wish to consider multiple criteria, variable threshold values and weighted ICERs have been suggested. Other approaches (i.e., replacement approach, program budgeting and marginal analysis) have focused on improving resource allocation, rather than maximizing health subject to a budget constraint. Alternatively, the generalized optimization framework and multi-criteria decision analysis make it possible to consider other criteria in addition to value.

Keywords: economic evaluation; incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; threshold; value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Generic market shares by volume of total medicines market in 2007.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Commission (2000). Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products. Official Journal of the European Communities L 18/1.
    1. Baltussen R., Niessen L. (2006). Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost. Eff. Resour. Alloc. 4, 14.10.1186/1478-7547-4-14 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett A., Roques T., Small M., Smith R. D. (2006). How much will Herceptin really cost? BMJ 333, 1118–1120 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bayoumi A. M. (2004). The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics. Pharmacoeconomics 22, 691–70010.2165/00019053-200422110-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell C. M., Urbach D. R., Ray J. G., Bayoumi A., Rosen A. B., Greenberg D., Neumann P. J. (2006). Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review. BMJ 332, 699–703 - PMC - PubMed