Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;13(6):417-25.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00310.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

Hepatic steatosis is not always a contraindication for cadaveric liver transplantation

Affiliations

Hepatic steatosis is not always a contraindication for cadaveric liver transplantation

Jan P Deroose et al. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Macrovesicular steatosis is assumed to be an important risk factor for early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Aim: To evaluate the impact of steatosis in combination with other risk factors on the outcome of OLT.

Methods: The degree of steatosis was analysed in 165 consecutive OLTs and was classified by histological examination as non (M0), mild (<30%, M1), moderate (30-60%, M2) or severe steatosis (>60%, M3). Recipients were analysed for EAD.

Results: EAD was observed in 28% of patients with M0, 26% with M1, 53% with M2 and 73% with M3 (P < 0.001). Patients with EAD had a significantly shorter graft survival after liver transplantation (P = 0.005) but did not correlate with survival. In multivariate regression analysis, the grade of steatosis, donating after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) grafts and duration of cold ischaemia time were significantly associated with EAD (P < 0.001, P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Livers with severe (M3) steatosis from DCD donors, combined with a prolonged CIT have a high risk for developing EAD which is correlated with shorter graft survival. Therefore M3 livers should only be considered for OLT in selected recipients without the presence of additional risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
First week post-operative values of aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT). *P < 0.05
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Graft survival vs. macro vesicular steatosis. (b) Graft survival vs. early allograft dysfunction
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Survival vs. macro vesicular steatosis. (b) Graft survival vs. early allograft dysfunction

References

    1. Koneru B, Dikdan G. Hepatic steatosis and liver transplantation current clinical and experimental perspectives. Transplantation. 2002;73:325–330. - PubMed
    1. Adam R, Reynes M, Johann M, Morino M, Astarcioglu I, Kafetzis I, et al. The outcome of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:1538–1540. - PubMed
    1. Todo S, Demetris AJ, Makowka L, Teperman L, Podesta L, Shaver T, et al. Primary nonfunction of hepatic allografts with preexisting fatty infiltration. Transplantation. 1989;47:903–905. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marsman WA, Wiesner RH, Rodriguez L, Batts KP, Porayko MK, Hay JE, et al. Use of fatty donor liver is associated with diminished early patient and graft survival. Transplantation. 1996;62:1246–1251. - PubMed
    1. Afonso RC, Saad WA, Parra OM, Leitao R, Ferraz-Neto BH. Impact of steatotic grafts on initial function and prognosis after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:909–911. - PubMed

MeSH terms