Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 24:9:76.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-76.

Combination therapy with vemurafenib (PLX4032/RG7204) and metformin in melanoma cell lines with distinct driver mutations

Affiliations

Combination therapy with vemurafenib (PLX4032/RG7204) and metformin in melanoma cell lines with distinct driver mutations

Franziska Niehr et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: A molecular linkage between the MAPK and the LKB1-AMPK energy sensor pathways suggests that combined MAPK oncogene inhibition and metabolic modulation of AMPK would be more effective than either manipulation alone in melanoma cell lines.

Materials and methods: The combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (formerly PLX4032) and metformin were tested against a panel of human melanoma cell lines with defined BRAF and NRAS mutations for effects on viability, cell cycle and apoptosis. Signaling molecules in the MAPK, PI3K-AKT and LKB1-AMPK pathways were studied by Western blot.

Results: Single agent metformin inhibited proliferation in 12 out of 19 cell lines irrespective of the BRAF mutation status, but in one NRASQ61K mutant cell line it powerfully stimulated cell growth. Synergistic anti-proliferative effects of the combination of metformin with vemurafenib were observed in 6 out of 11 BRAFV600E mutants, including highly synergistic effects in two BRAFV600E mutant melanoma cell lines. Antagonistic effects were noted in some cell lines, in particular in BRAFV600E mutant cell lines resistant to single agent vemurafenib. Seven out of 8 BRAF wild type cell lines showed marginally synergistic anti-proliferative effects with the combination, and one cell line had highly antagonistic effects with the combination. The differential effects were not dependent on the sensitivity to each drug alone, effects on cell cycle or signaling pathways.

Conclusions: The combination of vemurafenib and metformin tended to have stronger anti-proliferative effects on BRAFV600E mutant cell lines. However, determinants of vemurafenib and metformin synergism or antagonism need to be understood with greater detail before any potential clinical utility of this combination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of vemurafenib, metformin or the combination on cell proliferation and viability. a) Example of growth curves of BRAFV600E and NRASQ61 mutant melanoma cell lines. BRAFV600E cell lines included M263 (synergistic) and M308 (antagonistic). As representatives for NRASQ61 mutants M207 (synergistic) and SKMEL173 (antagonistic) are shown. The black line represents the data obtained with vemurafenib treatment, the blue line with metformin, and the red line with combination treatment. b) Combination index for the combination of 5 μM vemurafenib and 10 mM metformin of all melanoma cell lines tested. The green cell lines harbor BRAFV600E, red shows NRASQ61 mutant cell lines, and black the wild type cell line M257.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of single agent and combination therapy on cell cycle progression. Melanoma cells were treated with 5 μM vemurafenib, 10 mM metformin, or the combination for 24 hours. Afterwards cell cycle analysis was performed using DAPI staining and analyzed by flow cytometry. a) Cell cycle analysis of M263 treated with DMSO, vemurafenib, metformin, and the combination. b) Cell cycle changes after single agent vemurafenib. c) Cell cycle changes after single agent metformin. d) Cell cycle changes after combination of vemurafenib and metformin. Columns indicate a ratio of change over baseline (DMSO treatment). BRAFV600E mutants are presented in green, NRASQ61 in red, and the wild type M257 in black.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of single agent and combination therapy on apoptosis. To test the cytotoxic effects of the different treatments, melanoma cells were treated for 72 hours with 5 μM vemurafenib, 10 mM metformin, or the combination. Cells were stained with Annexin V and PI and were analyzed by flow cytometry. a) Annexin/PI staining of M263 as a representative example. Upper left corner: DMSO, upper right corner: vemurafenib, lower left corner: metformin, lower right corner: Combination of vemurafenib and metformin. b) Early and late apoptotic cells after 72-hour treatment with the indicated agents. Percentages are shown in relation to the control, DMSO treated cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Western blot analysis of different BRAFV600E mutant cell lines. Cells were exposed for 24 hours to 5 μM vemurafenib, 10 mM metformin, or the combination. Phosphorylation was analyzed with antibodies against specific phosphor-proteins compared to their total proteins. Synergistic characteristics of the cell lines are indicated as + (slight synergy), ++ (significant synergy), - (slight antagonism), and - - (significant antagonism).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Western blot analysis of different BRAFWT cell lines. Cells were exposed for 24 hours to 5 μM vemurafenib, 10 mM metformin, or the combination. Phosphorylation was analyzed with antibodies against specific phosphor-proteins compared to their total proteins. Synergistic characteristics of the cell lines are indicated as + (slight synergy), ++ (significant synergy), - (slight antagonism), and - - (significant antagonism).

References

    1. Padua RA, Barrass N, Currie GA. A novel transforming gene in a human malignant melanoma cell line. Nature. 1984;311:671–673. doi: 10.1038/311671a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, Woffendin H, Garnett MJ, Bottomley W. et al.Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417:949–954. doi: 10.1038/nature00766. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gray-Schopfer V, Wellbrock C, Marais R. Melanoma biology and new targeted therapy. Nature. 2007;445:851–857. doi: 10.1038/nature05661. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, Ribas A, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, O'Dwyer PJ, Lee RJ, Grippo JF, Nolop K, Chapman PB. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:809–819. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kefford R, Arkenau H, Brown MP, Millward M, Infante JR, Long GV, Ouellet D, Curtis M, Lebowitz PF, Falchokk GS. Phase I/II study of GSK2118436, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic mutant BRAF kinase, in patients with metastatic melanoma and other solid tumors. Proc American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28:611s.

Publication types

MeSH terms