Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Dec;34(4):434-47.
doi: 10.1177/0163278711406113. Epub 2011 May 24.

Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians

Jennifer Dykema et al. Eval Health Prof. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Little is known about what strategies are cost-effective in increasing participation among physicians in surveys that are conducted exclusively via the web. To assess the effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs, general internists (N = 3,550) were randomly selected from the American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile and assigned to experimental groups that varied in the amount of a promised incentive (none, entry into a $200 lottery, $50, or $100) and prenotification (none, prenotification letter only, or prenotification letter containing a $2 preincentive). Results indicated that the response rates were highest in the groups promised $100 and $50, respectively. While the postal prenotification letter increased response rates, the inclusion of a small token $2 preincentive had no effect on participation. Further, unlike mail surveys of physicians, the $2 preincentive was not cost-effective. Among physicians, larger promised incentives of $50 or $100 are more effective than a nominal preincentive in increasing participation in a web-only survey. Consistent with prior research, there was little evidence of nonresponse bias among the experimental groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interests with respect to the authorshipand/or publication of this article.

References

    1. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. (7th) 2011 AAPOR. Accessed on April 11th, 2011 from http://aapor.org/Content/NavigationMenu/AboutAAPOR/StandardsampEthics/St...)
    1. Asch DA, Christakis NA, Ubel PA. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget: A randomized trail comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives. Medical Care. 1998;36:95–99. - PubMed
    1. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1997;50:1129–1136. - PubMed
    1. Beebe TJ, Locke GR, Barnes SA, Davern ME, Anderson KJ. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians. Health Services Research. 2007;42:1219–1234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braithwaite D, Emery J, de Lusignan S, Sutton S. Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: A valid alternative? Family Practice. 2003;20:545–551. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources