Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 May 26:6:55.
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-55.

Curative treatment of oesophageal carcinoma: current options and future developments

Affiliations
Review

Curative treatment of oesophageal carcinoma: current options and future developments

Maria C Wolf et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Since the 1980s major advances in surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have established multimodal approaches as curative treatment options for oesophageal cancer. In addition the introduction of functional imaging modalities such as PET-CT created new opportunities for a more adequate patient selection and therapy response assessment.The majority of oesophageal carcinomas are represented by two histologies: squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. In recent years an epidemiological shift towards the latter was observed. From a surgical point of view, adenocarcinomas, which are usually located in the distal third of the oesophagus, may be treated with a transhiatal resection, whereas squamous cell carcinomas, which are typically found in the middle and the upper third, require a transthoracic approach. Since overall survival after surgery alone is poor, multimodality approaches have been developed. At least for patients with locally advanced tumors, surgery alone can no longer be advocated as routine treatment. Nowadays, scientific interest is focused on tumor response to induction radiochemotherapy. A neoadjuvant approach includes the early and accurate assessment of clinical response, optimally performed by repeated PET-CT imaging and endoscopic ultrasound, which may permit early adaption of the therapeutic concept. Patients with SCC that show clinical response by PET CT are considered to have a better prognosis, regardless of whether surgery will be performed or not. In non-responding patients salvage surgery improves survival, especially if complete resection is achieved.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Incarbone R, Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D, Peracchia A. Outcome of esophageal adenocarcinoma detected during endoscopic biopsy surveillance for Barrett's esophagus. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(2):263–266. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8161-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown LM, Hoover R, Silverman D, Baris D, Hayes R, Swanson GM, Schoenberg J, Greenberg R, Liff J, Schwartz A. et al.Excess incidence of squamous cell esophageal cancer among US Black men: role of social class and other risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(2):114–122. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.2.114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fukuzawa K, Noguchi Y, Yoshikawa T, Saito A, Doi C, Makino T, Takanashi Y, Ito T, Tsuburaya A. High incidence of synchronous cancer of the oral cavity and the upper gastrointestinal tract. Cancer Lett. 1999;144(2):145–151. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(99)00223-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonavina L, Incarbone R, Saino G, Clesi P, Peracchia A. Clinical outcome and survival after esophagectomy for carcinoma in elderly patients. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(2):90–93. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2003.00300.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein HJ. Esophagectomy as therapeutic principle for squamous cell esophageal cancer. Chirurg. 2005;76(11):1033–1043. doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1096-9. - DOI - PubMed