Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 May 26:11:27.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-27.

Designing clinical trials for assessing the effects of cognitive training and physical activity interventions on cognitive outcomes: the Seniors Health and Activity Research Program Pilot (SHARP-P) study, a randomized controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Designing clinical trials for assessing the effects of cognitive training and physical activity interventions on cognitive outcomes: the Seniors Health and Activity Research Program Pilot (SHARP-P) study, a randomized controlled trial

Claudine Legault et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of non-pharmacological intervention approaches such as physical activity, strength, and cognitive training for improving brain health has not been established. Before definitive trials are mounted, important design questions on participation/adherence, training and interventions effects must be answered to more fully inform a full-scale trial.

Methods: SHARP-P was a single-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial of a 4-month physical activity training intervention (PA) and/or cognitive training intervention (CT) in a 2 × 2 factorial design with a health education control condition in 73 community-dwelling persons, aged 70-85 years, who were at risk for cognitive decline but did not have mild cognitive impairment.

Results: Intervention attendance rates were higher in the CT and PACT groups: CT: 96%, PA: 76%, PACT: 90% (p=0.004), the interventions produced marked changes in cognitive and physical performance measures (p≤0.05), and retention rates exceeded 90%. There were no statistically significant differences in 4-month changes in composite scores of cognitive, executive, and episodic memory function among arms. Four-month improvements in the composite measure increased with age among participants assigned to physical activity training but decreased with age for other participants (intervention*age interaction p=0.01). Depending on the choice of outcome, two-armed full-scale trials may require fewer than 1,000 participants (continuous outcome) or 2,000 participants (categorical outcome).

Conclusions: Good levels of participation, adherence, and retention appear to be achievable for participants through age 85 years. Care should be taken to ensure that an attention control condition does not attenuate intervention effects. Depending on the choice of outcome measures, the necessary sample sizes to conduct four-year trials appear to be feasible.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00688155.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow through the trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention attendance rates (of expected) by month and overall. There was a significant overall trend for attendance rates to decline over time (p = 0.002).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between improvement in cognitive function and age with the physical activity intervention.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between improvement in cognitive function and age with no physical activity intervention.

References

    1. Acevedo A, Loewenstein DA. Nonpharmacologic cognitive interventions in aging and dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2007;20:239–249. doi: 10.1177/0891988707308808. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Desai AK, Grossberg GT, Chibnail JT. Health brain aging: a road map. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2009.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Middleton LE, Yaffe K. Targets for prevention of dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20:915–924. - PubMed
    1. Plassman BL, Williams JW, Burke JR, Holsinger T, Benjamin S. Systematic review: factors associated with risk for and possible prevention of cognitive decline in later life. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(3):182–193. - PubMed
    1. Fabre C, Chamari K, Mucci P, Massé-Biron J, Préfaut C. Improvement of cognitive function by mental and/or individualized aerobic training in healthy elderly subjects. Int J Sports Med. 2002;23:415–421. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33735. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data