Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;67(4):1406-13.
doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01619.x. Epub 2011 May 31.

A new criterion for confounder selection

Affiliations

A new criterion for confounder selection

Tyler J VanderWeele et al. Biometrics. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

We propose a new criterion for confounder selection when the underlying causal structure is unknown and only limited knowledge is available. We assume all covariates being considered are pretreatment variables and that for each covariate it is known (i) whether the covariate is a cause of treatment, and (ii) whether the covariate is a cause of the outcome. The causal relationships the covariates have with one another is assumed unknown. We propose that control be made for any covariate that is either a cause of treatment or of the outcome or both. We show that irrespective of the actual underlying causal structure, if any subset of the observed covariates suffices to control for confounding then the set of covariates chosen by our criterion will also suffice. We show that other, commonly used, criteria for confounding control do not have this property. We use formal theory concerning causal diagrams to prove our result but the application of the result does not rely on familiarity with causal diagrams. An investigator simply need ask, "Is the covariate a cause of the treatment?" and "Is the covariate a cause of the outcome?" If the answer to either question is "yes" then the covariate is included for confounder control. We discuss some additional covariate selection results that preserve unconfoundedness and that may be of interest when used with our criterion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unknown causal diagram illustrating confounding criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unknown causal diagram illustrating conditioning on an instrument, C3.

Comment in

References

    1. Abadie A, Imbens GW. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica. 2006;74:235–267.
    1. Brenner H. Bias due to non-differential misclassification of polytomous confounders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1993;46:57–63. - PubMed
    1. Cox DR. Planning of Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1958.
    1. Dawid AP. Influence diagrams for causal modelling and inference. Int Statist Rev. 2002;70:161–189.
    1. Geiger D, Verma TS, Pearl J. Identifying independence in Bayesian networks. Networks. 1990;20:507–534.

Publication types