Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul 15;26(11):4464-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 May 11.

Visual detection of Hg²⁺ in aqueous solution using gold nanoparticles and thymine-rich hairpin DNA probes

Affiliations

Visual detection of Hg²⁺ in aqueous solution using gold nanoparticles and thymine-rich hairpin DNA probes

Yuqing He et al. Biosens Bioelectron. .

Abstract

We report a sensitive method for visual detection of mercury ions (II) (Hg²⁺) in aqueous solution by using gold nanoparticles (Au-NPs) and thymine (T)-rich hairpin DNA probes. The thiolated hairpin DNA probe was immobilized on the Au-NP surface through a self-assembling method. Another thymine-rich, digoxin-labeled DNA probe was introduced to form DNA duplexes on the Au-NP surface with thymine-Hg²⁺-thymine (T-Hg²⁺-T) coordination in the presence of Hg²⁺. The Au-NPs associated with the formed duplexes were captured on the test zone of a lateral flow strip biocomponent (LFSB) by immunoreaction events between the digoxin on the duplexes and anti-digoxin antibodies on the LFSB. The accumulation of Au-NPs produced a characteristic red band on the test zone, enabling visual detection of Hg²⁺ without instrumentation. A detection limit of 0.1 nM was obtained under optimal experimental conditions. This method provides a simple, rapid, sensitive approach for the detection of Hg²⁺ and shows great promise for point-of-care and in-field detection of environmentally toxic mercury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of HO-Au-NP conjugates; (B) Schematic illustration of visual detection of Hg2+ on lateral flow strip biosensor; and (C) Visual detection of the sample solution with Hg2+ and without Hg2+ on the lateral flow strip biosensor; (D) Typical photo images and recorded optical responses of LFSBs in the absence (control) and presence of 10-nM Hg2+. Assay time: 30 min.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Histogram of the S/N ratio for the LFSB using the DNA detection probes with different numbers of thymine and (B) Effect of the DNA detection probe concentration on the S/N ratio of the LFSB. Hg2+ concentration: 50 nM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Effect of running buffer component on the S/N ratio of the LFSB; (B) Effect of HO-Au-NP conjugate amount on the S/N ratio of the LFSB. The conjugate amount was adjusted by changing the dispensing cycles of the conjugate on the pad; and (C) Effect of the amount of anti-digoxin on the S/N ratio of the LFSB. Hg2+ concentration: 50 nM; Assay time: 30 min.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Photo images (left) of the LFSBs with different concentrations of Hg2+ and the resulting calibration curve (right). The photo images of the LFSB were recorded with a digital camera, and the optical responses of red bands on the LFSB were recorded with a strip reader. Assay time: 30 min. Running buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl + 1.75 mM Mg2+ + 1/80 SSC.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) The optical intensities (peak areas) of the LFSB test zone analyzed with 50 nM Hg2+ and 1 μM of other metal ions. Blue bar: individual metal ions in the sample solution; Red bar: the mixture of Hg2+ (50 nM) and a corresponding metal ion; (B) The optical intensities of the LFSB test zone with 5 nM Hg2+ at different storage times (weeks). Data for each storage period were obtained from six LFSBs and error bars indicate standard deviations.

References

    1. Berlingame AL, Boyd RK, Gaskell SJ. Anal. Chem. 1996;68:599R–651R. - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Zheng A, Chen A, Gao Y, He C, Kai X, Wu G, Chen Y. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2007;599:134–142. - PubMed
    1. Dickerson TJ, Reed NN, LaClair JJ, Janda KD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:16582–16586. - PubMed
    1. Gao X, Xing G, Yang Y, Shi X, Liu R, Chu W, Jing L, Zhao F, Ye C, Yuan H, Fang X, Wang C, Zhao Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:9190–9191. - PubMed
    1. Guo L, Hu H, Sun R, Chen G. Talanta. 2009;79:775–779. - PubMed

Publication types