Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;9(2):49-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2010.03.002.

Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools

Victoria Misailidou  1 , Paraskevi Malliou, Anastasia Beneka, Alexandros Karagiannidis, Georgios Godolias
Affiliations

Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools

Victoria Misailidou et al. J Chiropr Med. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this literature review was to synthesize the existing literature on various definitions, classifications, selection criteria, and outcome measures used in different studies in patients with neck pain.

Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE and CINAHL through September 2008 was performed to gather articles on the reliability, validity, and utility of a wide variety of outcome measurements for neck pain.

Results: Different types of definitions appear in the literature based on anatomical location, etiology, severity, and duration of symptoms. Classifications according to severity and duration of pain and the establishment of selection criteria seem to play a crucial role in study designs and in clinical settings to ensure homogeneous groups and effective interventions. A series of objective tests and subjective self-report measures are useful in assessing physical abilities, pain, functional ability, psychosocial well-being, general health status, and quality of life in patients with neck pain. Self-administered questionnaires are commonly used in clinical practice and research projects.

Conclusions: Because of multidimensionality of chronic neck pain, more than just one index may be needed to gain a complete health profile of the patient with neck pain. The instruments chosen should be reliable, valid, and able to evaluate the effects of treatment.

Keywords: Assessment; Neck pain; Pain measurements; Patient outcome assessment; Treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Swinkels R.A., Oostendorp R.A. Outcomes assessment and measurement in spinal musculoskeletal disorders (chapter 41) In: Boyling J., Jull G., editors. Grieve's modern manual therapy: the vertebral column. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone; London: 2005. pp. 591–601.
    1. Kay T.M., Myers A.M., Huijbregts M.P.J. How far have we come since 1992? A comparative study of physiotherapists' use of outcome measures. Physiother Can. 2001;53:268–275.
    1. Huijbregts M.P.J., Myers A.M., Kay T.M., Gavin T.S. Systematic outcome measurement in clinical practice: challenges experienced by physiotherapists. Physiother Can. 2002;54:25–31.
    1. Liebenson C., Yeomans S. Outcome assessment in musculoskeletal medicine. Man Ther. 1997;2(2):67–74. - PubMed
    1. Petty N.J., Moore A.P. Churchill Livingstone; London: 2004. Principles of neuromusculoskeletal treatment and management: a guide for therapists.