Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Aug;86(8):640-5.
doi: 10.1002/ajh.22053. Epub 2011 May 31.

Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CRd) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from a phase 2 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CRd) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from a phase 2 trial

Shaji K Kumar et al. Am J Hematol. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

The combination of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone is an effective treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). Addition of alkylating agents to lenalidomide or thalidomide results in increased response rates and deeper responses. We designed this trial to study the combination of cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRd) as initial therapy for MM. Fifty-three patients with previously untreated symptomatic MM was enrolled. Patients received 4-week treatment cycles consisting of lenalidomide (25 mg daily for 3 weeks), dexamethasone (40 mg weekly), and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks). A partial response or better was seen in 85% of patients including 47% with a very good partial response or better. The toxicities were manageable with over 80% of planned doses delivered; six patients went off study for toxicity. The median progression free survival (PFS) for the entire group was 28 months (95% CI: 22.7-32.6) and the overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 87% (95% CI: 78-96). Importantly, 14 patients with high-risk MM had similar PFS and OS as the standard-risk patients (n = 39). CRd is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for upfront therapy of MM with high response rates and excellent 2-year OS, and is suitable for long-term therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00478218.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: M.Q.L., S.K.K., J.R.M., and A.D. sponsored research funded by Celgene; S.R.H., F.K.B., P.R.G., J.A.L., S.V.R., S.R.Z., P.L.B., C.B.R., T.E.W., R.F., S.J.R., and D.D. have nothing to disclose relevant to current manuscript. K.S., R.F., and M.A.G. have received consulting fees from Celgene. R.F. has received a patent for the prognostication of M.M. based on genetic categorization of the disease.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure presents the actual decrease in the M-protein measurements as a proportion of the baseline values using a waterfall plot of response depth at the end of four cycles of therapy. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Figure 2
Figure 2
A: Figure provides information on the frequency and grade of various toxicities seen across the trial, grouped by patients (n = 53). The maximum grade of an individual toxicity seen in any given patient is presented. If a patient had multiple occurrences of a particular toxicity, only the highest grade is presented. B: Figure provides estimates of frequency and grade of various toxicities seen across all cycles (n = 699) grouped by toxicities. If a patient had multiple occurrences of any particular toxicity, each will be counted. C: Median (interquartile range; IQR) for total white cell count (WBC), ANC, and platelet counts (PLT) during the first 12 cycles of treatment are presented. There is no progressive decline in the counts over the 12 cycles, beyond that seen in the initial cycles, suggesting lack of any cumulative hematological toxicity with the combination of lenalidomide and cyclophosphamide.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A: Figure depicts the Kaplan Meier plots for OS and PFS for all patients enrolled on the study (N = 53). B: Figure depicts the Kaplan Meier plots for OS and PFS for all patients grouped by risk status (mSMART high-risk criteria); 14 patients had high-risk myeloma and 39 patients were considered as standard risk. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]

References

    1. Kumar SK, Mikhael JR, Buadi FK, et al. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: Updated mayo stratification of myeloma and risk-adapted therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:1095–1110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar S. Multiple myeloma-current issues and controversies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36(Suppl 2):S3–11. - PubMed
    1. Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2609–2617. - PubMed
    1. Rajkumar SV. Treatment of myeloma: Cure vs control. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:1142–1145. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, et al. Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:431–436. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data