Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jul 22;286(29):25443-9.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.199703. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics

Affiliations
Review

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics

Fang Xie et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

LC-MS-based quantitative proteomics has become increasingly applied to a wide range of biological applications due to growing capabilities for broad proteome coverage and good accuracy and precision in quantification. Herein, we review the current LC-MS-based quantification methods with respect to their advantages and limitations and highlight their potential applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
General workflow for LC-MS-based global proteomics. Proteins in complex biological samples are first converted into peptides by proteolytic digestion (e.g. tryptic digestion). The resulting peptide mixture is then separated by LC and ionized by electrospray before entering the mass spectrometer. In a typical data-dependent acquisition operation mode, a full MS spectrum is acquired for the peptides that are eluting from the LC column at any given time; one of the most intensive ion species (i.e. peptides) is then isolated and fragmented to obtain the MS pattern of its fragments (i.e. MS/MS spectrum). Because peptide bonds are prone to fragmentation under collision-induced dissociation conditions in the MS/MS analysis and produce predominantly b- or y-type ions (N- or C-terminal fragments carrying charge, respectively), the peptide sequence can be readily deduced from the MS/MS spectrum. This process is fully automated by searching the MS/MS spectra against protein sequence databases. Possible post-translational modifications can also be identified by including dynamic modification on certain amino acid residues (e.g. Ser, Thr, or Tyr for phosphorylation) in the database search. Quantification of each peptide is typically performed at the extracted ion chromatogram level; however, for isobaric tagging approaches (e.g. iTRAQ), quantification is carried out at the MS/MS spectrum level. PTMs, post-translational modifications.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Schematic diagrams of three major strategies in quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling. A, pairwise comparison is used to compare two samples; 18O labeling, SILAC, and ICAT fall into this category. B, multiple comparison is used to compare up to four, six, or eight samples depending the isobaric tags used (i.e. 4-plex iTRAQ, 6-plex TMT, or 8-plex iTRAQ). C, large-scale comparison employs an internal standard: 18O-labeled universal reference, super-SILAC mixture, or synthetic isotope-labeled peptides. AQUA, absolute quantification.

Comment in

References

    1. Ong S. E., Mann M. (2005) Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 252–262 - PubMed
    1. Domon B., Aebersold R. (2010) Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 710–721 - PubMed
    1. Qian W. J., Jacobs J. M., Liu T., Camp D. G., 2nd, Smith R. D. (2006) Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 1727–1744 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domon B., Aebersold R. (2006) Science 312, 212–217 - PubMed
    1. Cravatt B. F., Simon G. M., Yates J. R., 3rd (2007) Nature 450, 991–1000 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources