Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun 1;25(11):1185-92.
doi: 10.1101/gad.2027811.

Foxl1-Cre-marked adult hepatic progenitors have clonogenic and bilineage differentiation potential

Affiliations

Foxl1-Cre-marked adult hepatic progenitors have clonogenic and bilineage differentiation potential

Soona Shin et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Isolation of hepatic progenitor cells is a promising approach for cell replacement therapy of chronic liver disease. The winged helix transcription factor Foxl1 is a marker for progenitor cells and their descendants in the mouse liver in vivo. Here, we purify progenitor cells from Foxl1-Cre; RosaYFP mice and evaluate their proliferative and differentiation potential in vitro. Treatment of Foxl1-Cre; RosaYFP mice with a 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine diet led to an increase of the percentage of YFP-labeled Foxl1(+) cells. Clonogenic assays demonstrated that up to 3.6% of Foxl1(+) cells had proliferative potential. Foxl1(+) cells differentiated into cholangiocytes and hepatocytes in vitro, depending on the culture condition employed. Microarray analyses indicated that Foxl1(+) cells express stem cell markers such as Prom1 as well as differentiation markers such as Ck19 and Hnf4a. Thus, the Foxl1-Cre; RosaYFP model allows for easy isolation of adult hepatic progenitor cells that can be expanded and differentiated in culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Labeling of the Foxl1-Cre lineage in RosaYFP mice. YFP+ cells are present within the periportal region in an injured mouse liver.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
YFP+ cell number increases after treatment with a DDC-supplemented diet. (A) FACS data of nonparenchymal cells from the liver of Foxl1-Cre; RosaYFP mice fed chow or DDC diets. CD45 is a marker for hematopoietic cells. (Rectangle) CD45/YFP+ fraction. (B) A time-dependent increase of CD45/YFP+ cells is shown. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Foxl1+ cells are capable of self-renewal. (A) YFP+ cells are enriched for Foxl1. mRNA levels of Foxl1 are shown; (*) P < 0.05, liver versis YFP+; (^) P < 0.05, YFP versus YFP+ (n = 4). (B) Percent of colonies over total number of cells. (*) P < 0.05 (n = 6). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (C) YFP+ and YFP cells from Foxl1-Cre; RosaYFP mice were cultured for 7 d. A representative colony is shown.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Foxl1+ cells are capable of differentiating into cholangiocytes and hepatocytes. (A) Foxl1+ cells differentiate into duct-like cells when stimulated by collagen type 1A and TNFα. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of duct-like cells for CK19 (red) and nuclei (blue). (C,D) Periodic acid–Schiff staining of untreated cells (C) and cells differentiated into hepatocytes for 21 d (D). (E) mRNA levels of hepatocyte markers. Foxl1+ cells were treated with Matrigel and oncostatin M for 7 d (n = 4). (L) Liver; (U) undifferentiated; (T) differentiated. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (*) P < 0.05, untreated versus treated. (F) Number of clonal cell lines that have bilineage potential.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Microarray analyses of Foxl1+ and Foxl1 cells. Foxl1-Cre; RosaYFP mice were fed a chow diet (day 0) or a DDC diet for 3, 7, and 14 d (n = 4). Expression levels are shown relative to day 0 nonparenchymal cells. (Closed triangle, solid line) YFP+; (open circle, dotted line) YFP; (*) false discovery rate (FDR) < 20, versus day 0.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Foxl1-Cre; YFP+ cells are a subset of Sox9+ cells. Representative images from the liver of a Foxl1-Cre; RosaYFP mouse fed a DDC diet for 7 d are shown.

Comment in

References

    1. Bird TG, Lorenzini S, Forbes SJ 2008. Activation of stem cells in hepatic diseases. Cell Tissue Res 331: 283–300 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chu AS, Diaz R, Hui JJ, Yanger K, Zong Y, Alpini G, Stanger BZ, Wells RG 2011. Lineage tracing demonstrates no evidence of cholangiocyte epithelial-to-tomesenchymal transition in murine models of hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology. doi: 10.1002/hep/24206 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, Lempicki RA 2003. DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol 4: 3 doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r60 - PubMed
    1. Dorrell C, Erker L, Schug J, Kopp JL, Canaday PS, Fox AJ, Smirnova O, Duncan AW, Finegold MJ, Sander M, et al. 2011. Prospective isolation of a bipotential clonogenic liver progenitor cell in adult mice. Genes Dev (this issue) doi: 10.1101/gad.2029411 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dudas J, Elmaouhoub A, Mansuroglu T, Batusic D, Tron K, Saile B, Papoutsi M, Pieler T, Wilting J, Ramadori G 2006. Prospero-related homeobox 1 (Prox1) is a stable hepatocyte marker during liver development, injury and regeneration, and is absent from ‘oval cells.’ Histochem Cell Biol 126: 549–562 - PubMed

Publication types