From universal laws of cognition to specific cognitive models
- PMID: 21635331
- DOI: 10.1080/03640210701801941
From universal laws of cognition to specific cognitive models
Abstract
The remarkable successes of the physical sciences have been built on highly general quantitative laws, which serve as the basis for understanding an enormous variety of specific physical systems. How far is it possible to construct universal principles in the cognitive sciences, in terms of which specific aspects of perception, memory, or decision making might be modelled? Following Shepard (e.g., 1987), it is argued that some universal principles may be attainable in cognitive science. Here, 2 examples are proposed: the simplicity principle (which states that the cognitive system prefers patterns that provide simpler explanations of available data); and the scale-invariance principle, which states that many cognitive phenomena are independent of the scale of relevant underlying physical variables, such as time, space, luminance, or sound pressure. This article illustrates how principles may be combined to explain specific cognitive processes by using these principles to derive SIMPLE, a formal model of memory for serial order (Brown, Neath, & Chater, 2007), and briefly mentions some extensions to models of identification and categorization. This article also considers the scope and limitations of universal laws in cognitive science.
2008 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Scaling laws in cognitive sciences.Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 May;14(5):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Apr 1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010. PMID: 20363176 Review.
-
Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):255-74. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001525. Behav Brain Sci. 2013. PMID: 23673021 Review.
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
Correcting the SIMPLE model of free recall.Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):293-6. doi: 10.1037/a0030971. Psychol Rev. 2013. PMID: 23356782
-
Issues with the SIMPLE model: comment on Brown, Neath, and Chater (2007).Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):779-80; discussion 781-5. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.779. Psychol Rev. 2008. PMID: 18729602
Cited by
-
A unified mathematical framework for coding time, space, and sequences in the hippocampal region.J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 26;34(13):4692-707. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5808-12.2014. J Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24672015 Free PMC article.
-
Scale-Dependent Relationships in Natural Language.Comput Brain Behav. 2021 Jun;4:164-177. doi: 10.1007/s42113-020-00094-8. Epub 2021 Jan 4. Comput Brain Behav. 2021. PMID: 34337323 Free PMC article.
-
Computation by oscillations: implications of experimental data for theoretical models of grid cells.Hippocampus. 2008;18(12):1186-99. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20501. Hippocampus. 2008. PMID: 19021252 Free PMC article.
-
Learning temporal relationships between symbols with Laplace Neural Manifolds.ArXiv [Preprint]. 2024 Sep 22:arXiv:2302.10163v4. ArXiv. 2024. PMID: 36866224 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
On coding non-contiguous letter combinations.Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 21;2:136. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00136. eCollection 2011. Front Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21734901 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources