Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Oct;22(10):1141-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02091.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

β-blockers protect against dispersion of repolarization during exercise in congenital long-QT syndrome type 1

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

β-blockers protect against dispersion of repolarization during exercise in congenital long-QT syndrome type 1

Lee W Gemma et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: β-Blocker therapy reduces syncope and sudden death in long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1), but the mechanism of protection is incompletely understood. This study tested the hypothesis that β-blockade reduces QT prolongation and dispersion of repolarization, measured as the T peak-to-end interval (T(pe) ), during exercise and recovery in LQT1 patients.

Methods and results: QT and T(pe) were measured in 10 LQT1 patients (33 ± 13 years) and 35 normal subjects (32 ± 12 years) during exercise tests on and off β-blockade. In LQT1 patients, β-blockade reduced QT (391 ± 25 milliseconds vs 375 ± 26 milliseconds, P = 0.04 during exercise; 419 ± 41 milliseconds vs 391 ± 39 milliseconds, P = 0.02 during recovery) and markedly reduced T(pe) (91 ± 26 milliseconds vs 67 ± 19 milliseconds, P = 0.03 during exercise; 103 ± 26 milliseconds vs 78 ± 11 milliseconds, P = 0.02 during recovery). In contrast, in normal subjects, β-blockade had no effect on QT (320 ± 17 milliseconds vs 317 ± 16 milliseconds, P = 0.29 during exercise; 317 ± 13 milliseconds vs 315 ± 14 milliseconds, P = 0.15 during recovery) and mildly reduced T(pe) (69 ± 13 milliseconds vs 61 ± 11 milliseconds, P = 0.01 during exercise; 77 ± 19 milliseconds vs. 68 ± 14 milliseconds, P < 0.001 during recovery).

Conclusion: In LQT1 patients, β-blockers reduced QT and T(pe) during exercise and recovery, supporting the theory that β-blocker therapy protects LQT1 patients by reducing dispersion of repolarization during exercise and recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of Tpe measurement, in which a best-fit tangent line was drawn to the isoelectric line, and Tpe interval was defined by drawing a vertical line from the Tpeak to the isoelectric line.
Figure 2
Figure 2
QT at matched HR (106 ± 3 bpm) during exercise in normal subjects = 320 ± 17 msec before BB and 317 ± 16 msec after BB; p = 0.29. QT at matched HR (106 ± 4 bpm) in LQT1 subjects = 391 ± 25 msec before BB and 375 ± 26 msec after BB; p = 0.04.
Figure 3
Figure 3
QT at matched HR (105 ± 2 bpm) during recovery in normal subjects = 317 ± 13 msec before BB and 315 ± 14 msec after BB; p = 0.15. QT at matched HR (106 ± 5 bpm) = 419 ± 41 msec before BB and 391 ± 39 msec after BB; p = 0.02.
Figure 4
Figure 4
QT at matched HR during exercise and recovery before and after BB. Solid dots represent individual LQT1 subjects and open dots represent mean values for 35 normal subjects.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Tpe at rest, peak exercise, and 1 minute into recovery in normal subjects and LQT1 subjects on and off BB. *p < 0.05 for comparison of off vs. on BB between paired samples of normal or LQT1 subjects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Swan H, Toivonen L, Viitasalo M. Rate adaptation of QT intervals during and after exercise in children with congenital long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:508–513. - PubMed
    1. Swan H, Viitasalo M, Piippo K, Laitinen P, Kontula K, Toivonen L. Sinus node function and ventricular repolarization during exercise stress test in long QT syndrome patients with KvLQT1 and HERG potassium channel defects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:823–829. - PubMed
    1. Shimizu W, Ohe T, Kurita T, Shimomura K. Differential response of QTU interval to exercise, isoproterenol, and atrial pacing in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991;14:1966–1970. - PubMed
    1. Ackerman MJ, Khositseth A, Tester DJ, Hejlik JB, Shen WK, Porter CB. Epinephrine-induced QT interval prolongation: a gene-specific paradoxical response in congenital long QT syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:413–421. - PubMed
    1. Shimizu W, Noda T, Takaki H, Kurita T, Nagaya N, Satomi K, Suyama K, Aihara N, Kamakura S, Sunagawa K, Echigo S, Nakamura K, Ohe T, Towbin JA, Napolitano C, Priori SG. Epinephrine unmasks latent mutation carriers with LQT1 form of congenital long-QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:633–642. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms