Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun 2:11:141.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-141.

Appraisal of literature reviews on end-of-life care for minority ethnic groups in the UK and a critical comparison with policy recommendations from the UK end-of-life care strategy

Natalie Evans  1 , Arantza Meñaca, Erin Vw Andrew, Jonathan Koffman, Richard Harding, Irene J Higginson, Robert Pool, Marjolein Gysels; PRISMA
Collaborators, Affiliations

Appraisal of literature reviews on end-of-life care for minority ethnic groups in the UK and a critical comparison with policy recommendations from the UK end-of-life care strategy

Natalie Evans et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence of low end-of-life (EoL) care service use by minority ethnic groups in the UK has given rise to a body of research and a number of reviews of the literature. This article aims to review and evaluate literature reviews on minority ethnic groups and EoL care in the UK and assess their suitability as an evidence base for policy.

Methods: Systematic review. Searches were carried out in thirteen electronic databases, eight journals, reference lists, and grey literature. Reviews were included if they concerned minority ethnic groups and EoL care in the UK. Reviews were graded for quality and key themes identified.

Results: Thirteen reviews (2001-2009) met inclusion criteria. Seven took a systematic approach, of which four scored highly for methodological quality (a mean score of six, median seven). The majority of systematic reviews were therefore of a reasonable methodological quality. Most reviews were restricted by ethnic group, aspect of EoL care, or were broader reviews which reported relevant findings. Six key themes were identified.

Conclusions: A number of reviews were systematic and scored highly for methodological quality. These reviews provide a good reflection of the primary evidence and could be used to inform policy. The complexity and inter-relatedness of factors leading to low service use was recognised and reflected in reviews' recommendations for service improvement. Recommendations made in the UK End-of-Life Care Strategy were limited in comparison, and the Strategy's evidence base concerning minority ethnic groups was found to be narrow. Future policy should be embedded strongly in the evidence base to reflect the current literature and minimise bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram detailing the article selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brealey S. What is evidence based medicine? An emerging science not fashionable rhetoric. Radiography. 2001;7(1):7–10. doi: 10.1053/radi.2000.0296. - DOI
    1. Hawker S, Payne S, Kerr C, Hardey M, Powell J. Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research. 2002;12(9):1284. doi: 10.1177/1049732302238251. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook D, Mulrow C, Haynes R. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997;126(5):376. - PubMed
    1. Bero L, Jadad A. How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997;127(1):37. - PubMed
    1. Walsh D, Downe S. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;50(2):204–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources