Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;33(2):205-13.
doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000028. Epub 2010 Jun 1.

Genomic imbalances in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma identified by molecular cytogenetic techniques

Affiliations

Genomic imbalances in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma identified by molecular cytogenetic techniques

Marilanda Ferreira Bellini et al. Genet Mol Biol. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

This review summarizes the chromosomal changes detected by molecular cytogenetic approaches in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the ninth most common malignancy in the world. Whole genome analyses of ESCC cell lines and tumors indicated that the most frequent genomic gains occurred at 1, 2q, 3q, 5p, 6p, 7, 8q, 9q, 11q, 12p, 14q, 15q, 16, 17, 18p, 19q, 20q, 22q and X, with focal amplifications at 1q32, 2p16-22, 3q25-28, 5p13-15.3, 7p12-22, 7q21-22, 8q23-24.2, 9q34, 10q21, 11p11.2, 11q13, 13q32, 14q13-14, 14q21, 14q31-32, 15q22-26, 17p11.2, 18p11.2-11.3 and 20p11.2. Recurrent losses involved 3p, 4, 5q, 6q, 7q, 8p, 9, 10p, 12p, 13, 14p, 15p, 18, 19p, 20, 22, Xp and Y. Gains at 5p and 7q, and deletions at 4p, 9p, and 11q were significant prognostic factors for patients with ESCC. Gains at 6p and 20p, and losses at 10p and 10q were the most significant imbalances, both in primary carcinoma and in metastases, which suggested that these regions may harbor oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Gains at 12p and losses at 3p may be associated with poor relapse-free survival. The clinical applicability of these changes as markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of ESCC, or as molecular targets for personalized therapy should be evaluated.

Keywords: CGH; FISH; esophageal carcinoma; genomic imbalances; molecular cytogenetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of copy number alterations in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Regions with copy number gains are represented by thin lines on the right side of the chromosome idiograms and amplifications are represented by thick bars on the same side; regions of loss are represented by thin lines on the left side of the idiograms. (A) In ESCC cell lines, the most frequent genomic gains were observed in chromosomes 1, 2q, 3q, 5p, 6p, 7, 8q, 9q, 11q, 12p, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18p, 19q, 20q, 22q and X. Focal amplifications were found at 1q32, 2p16-22, 3q25-28, 5p13-15.3, 7p12-22, 7q21-22, 8q23-24.2, 9q34, 10q21, 11p11.2, 11q13, 13q32, 14q13-14, 14q21, 14q31-32, 15q22-26, 17p11.2, 18p11.2-11.3 and 20p11.2. Recurrent losses occurred at 3p, 4, 5q, 6q, 7q, 8p, 9, 10p, 12p, 13, 14p, 15p, 18, 20, 22, Xp and Y. (B) In clinical specimens, chromosomal gains were common in 1q, 2q, 3q, 5p, 6, 7, 8q, 9, 10, 11q, 12, 13q, 14q, 16p, 17, 18q, 20 and Xq, specifically in the regions 1p34, 2p24, 2q24-34, 3q22-ter, 7p12-22, 8q13-qter, 11p11.2, 11q13, 12p11.2, 13q21-34, 17q12, 20q12-13 and Xq27-28. Recurrent losses occurred at 1p, 3q, 4p, 5q, 6, 8p, 11q, 12q, 13q, 14q, 16q, 17q, 18q, 19, 21q, 22q and Y.

References

    1. Ando T., Ishiguro H., Kimura M., Mitsui A., Mori Y., Sugito N., Tomoda K., Mori R., Harada K., Katada T, et al. Frequent loss of the long arm of chromosome 18 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2007;17:1005–1011. - PubMed
    1. Arai H., Ueno T., Tangoku A., Yoshino S., Abe T., Kawauchi S., Oga A., Furuya T., Oka M., Sasaki K. Detection of amplified oncogenes by genome DNA microarrays in human primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Comparison with conventional comparative genomic hybridization analysis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;146:16–21. - PubMed
    1. Bauman J.G., Wiegant J., Borst P., van Duijn P. A new method for fluorescence microscopical localization of specific DNA sequences by in situ hybridization of fluorochromelabelled RNA. Exp Cell Res. 1980;128:485–490. - PubMed
    1. Bizari L., Borim A.A., Leite K.R., Gonçalves F de T., Cury P.M., Tajara E.H., Silva A.E. Alterations of the CCND1 and HER-2/neu (ERBB2) proteins in esophageal and gastric cancers. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;165:41–50. - PubMed
    1. Carneiro A., Isinger A., Karlsson A., Johansson J., Jönsson G., Bendahl P.O., Falkenback D., Halvarsson B., Nilbert M. Prognostic impact of array-based genomic profiles in esophageal squamous cell cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:98–107. - PMC - PubMed

Internet Resources

    1. American Cancer Society. [September 10, 2009]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_are_the_key_st...
    1. Genome, National Human Genome Research Institute. [January 20, 2009]. Available from: http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Hyperion/DIR/VIP/Glossary/Illustration/fish....
    1. Instituto Nacional do Cancer (INCA) [September 10, 2009a ]. Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br/conteudo_view.asp?id=328.
    1. [September 10, 2009b ]. Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2008/index.asp?link=tabelaestados.asp&....
    1. Medical Genetics Laboratories. [December 22, 2008]. Available from: http://www.bcm.edu/geneticlabs/tests/cyto/105Kcma.html.

LinkOut - more resources