Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;32(2):306-11.
doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572009005000026. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

Implementation of a parentage control system in Portuguese beef-cattle with a panel of microsatellite markers

Affiliations

Implementation of a parentage control system in Portuguese beef-cattle with a panel of microsatellite markers

Inês Carolino et al. Genet Mol Biol. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the feasibility of applying a panel of 10 microsatellite markers in parentage control of beef cattle in Portugal. In the first stage, DNA samples were collected from 475 randomly selected animals of the Charolais, Limousin and Preta breeds. Across breeds and genetic markers, means for average number of alleles, effective number of alleles, expected heterozygosity and polymorphic information content, were 8.20, 4.43, 0.733 and 0.70, respectively. Enlightenment from the various markers differed among breeds, but the set of 10 markers resulted in a combined probability above 0.9995 in the ability to exclude a random putative parent. The marker-set thus developed was later used for parentage control in a group of 140 calves from several breeds, where there was the suspicion of possible faulty parentage recording. Overall, 76.4% of the calves in this group were compatible with the recorded parents, with most incompatibilities due to misidentification of the dam. Efforts must be made to improve the quality of pedigree information, with particular emphasis on information recorded at the calf's birth.

Keywords: cattle; genetic markers; microsatellites; parentage control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Allele frequencies by locus-breed combination, with bubble size proportional to frequency by breed (CH = Charolais, LI = Limousin, PR = Preta).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Combined probability of exclusion (CPE) in parentage testing with increasing number of microsatellite markers, by breed (CH = Charolais, LI = Limousin, PR = Preta).

References

    1. Banos G., Wiggans G.R., Powell R.L. Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84:2523–2529. - PubMed
    1. Barendse W., Armitage S.M. A genetic linkage map of the bovine genome. Nat Genet. 1994;6:227–235. - PubMed
    1. Baron E.E., Martinez M.L., Verneque R.S., Coutinho L.L. Parentage testing and effect of misidentification on the estimation of breeding value in Gir cattle. Genet Mol Biol. 2002;25:389–394.
    1. Bishop M.D., Kappes S.M. A genetic linkage map for cattle. Genetics. 1994;136:619–639. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Botstein D., White R.L., Skolnick M.H., Davies R.W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32:314–331. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources