Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan:11:e011.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.576. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

Use of a knowledge synthesis by decision makers and planners to facilitate system level integration in a large Canadian provincial health authority

Affiliations

Use of a knowledge synthesis by decision makers and planners to facilitate system level integration in a large Canadian provincial health authority

Esther Suter et al. Int J Integr Care. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: The study is an examination of how a knowledge synthesis, conducted to fill an information gap identified by decision makers and planners responsible for integrating health systems in a western Canadian health authority, is being used within that organization.

Methods: Purposive sampling and snowball technique were used to identify 13 participants who were interviewed about how they are using the knowledge synthesis for health services planning and decision-making.

Results: The knowledge synthesis is used by those involved in the strategic direction of the provincial healthcare organization and those tasked with the operationalization of integration at the provincial or local level. Both groups most frequently use the 10 key principles for integration, followed by the sections on integration processes, strategies and models. The key principles facilitate discussion on priority areas to be considered and provide a reference point for a desired future state. Perceived information gaps relate to a lack of detail on 'how to' strategies, tools and processes that would lead to successful integration.

Discussion and conclusion: The current project demonstrates that decision makers and planners will effectively use a knowledge synthesis if it is timely, relevant and accessible. The information can be applied at strategic and operations levels. Attention needs to be paid to include more information on implementation strategies and processes. Including knowledge users in identifying research questions will increase information uptake.

Keywords: community health centres; decision makers and planners; health systems integration; integrated seniors health; knowledge synthesis uptake; knowledge translation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Campbell DM, Redman S, Jorm L, Cooke M, Zwi AB, Rychetnik L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: Practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6:21. [cited 08 March 2011]. Available from: http://www.anzhealthpolicy.com/content/6/1/21/abstract. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, Osei E. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet. 2004;364:1615–21. - PubMed
    1. Lomas J. Using research to inform healthcare managers’ and policy makers’ questions: From summative to interpretive synthesis. Healthcare Policy. 2005;1(1):55–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pope C, Mays N, Popay J. Informing policy making and management in healthcare: The place for synthesis. Healthcare Policy. 2006;1(2):43–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roger R. A decision-maker’s perspective on Lavis and Lomas. Healthcare Policy. 2006;1(2):49–54. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources