Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jun 5:11:28.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-28.

Persons with dementia missing in the community: is it wandering or something unique?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Persons with dementia missing in the community: is it wandering or something unique?

Meredeth A Rowe et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: At some point in the disease process many persons with dementia (PWD) will have a missing incident and be unable to safely return to their care setting. In previous research studies, researchers have begun to question whether this phenomenon should continue to be called wandering since the antecedents and characteristics of a missing incident are dissimilar to accepted definitions of wandering in dementia. The purpose of this study was to confirm previous findings regarding the antecedents and characteristics of missing incidents, understand the differences between those found dead and alive, and compare the characteristics of a missing incident to that of wandering.

Methods: A retrospective design was used to analyse 325 newspaper reports of PWD missing in the community.

Results: The primary antecedent to a missing incident, particularly in community-dwelling PWD, was becoming lost while conducting a normal and permitted activity alone in the community. The other common antecedent was a lapse in supervision with the expectation that the PWD would remain in a safe location but did not. Deaths most commonly occurred in unpopulated areas due to exposure and drowning. Those who died were found closer to the place last seen and took longer to find, but there were no significant differences in gender or age. The key characteristics of a missing incident were: unpredictable, non-repetitive, temporally appropriate but spatially-disordered, and while using multiple means of movement (walking, car, public transportation). Missing incidents occurred without the discernible pattern present in wandering such as lapping or pacing, repetitive and temporally-disordered.

Conclusions: This research supports the mounting evidence that the concept of wandering, in its formal sense, and missing incidents are two distinct concepts. It will be important to further develop the concept of missing incidents by identifying the differences and similarities from wandering. This will allow a more targeted assessment and intervention strategy for each problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Carr D, Muschert GW, Kinney J, Robbins E, Petonito G, Manning L, Brown JS. Silver alerts and the problem of missing adults with dementia. Gerontologist. pp. 149–157. - PubMed
    1. McShane R, Gedling K, Keene J, Fairburn C, Jacoby R, Hope T. Getting lost in dementia: a longitudinal study of a behavioral symptom. Int Psychogeriatr. 1998;10(3):253–260. doi: 10.1017/S1041610298005365. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Algase DL, Moore DH, Vandeweerd C, Gavin-Dreschnack DJ. Mapping the maze of terms and definitions in dementia-related wandering. Aging Ment Health. 2007;11(6):686–698. doi: 10.1080/13607860701366434. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koester RJ. The lost Alzheimer's and related disorders subject: New research and perspectives. Response 98 NASAR: 1998; Chantilly, VA. 1998. pp. 165–181.
    1. Rowe M, Glover J. Antecendents, descriptions and consequences of wandering in cognitively-impaired adults and the Safe Return (SR) program. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias. 2001;16(6):344–352. doi: 10.1177/153331750101600610. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types