Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;3(2):22-29.

In vitro remineralization of human and bovine white-spot enamel lesions by NaF dentifrices: A pilot study

In vitro remineralization of human and bovine white-spot enamel lesions by NaF dentifrices: A pilot study

R L Karlinsey et al. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the in vitro remineralization effects of four dentifrice systems using microhardness and fluoride uptake analyses. In vitro testing for the potential remineralization of the white-spot lesions in bovine and human enamel was performed using a 10-day pH cycling model. The study involved the following NaF silica-based dentifrices: 1) placebo (0 ppm F), 2) 500 ppm F, 3) 1150 ppm F, and 4) 500 ppm F plus functionalized tricalcium phosphate (fTCP). Each day consisted of four two-minute treatments, one four-hour acid challenge (pH = 5.0), and immersion in artificial saliva (pH = 7.0) between these events. After cycling, specimens were analyzed for surface microhardness (SMH), enamel fluoride uptake (EFU), and cross-sectional microhardness (CSM). Statistical analyses revealed significant differences (ANOVA, LSD, p<0.05) among the four groups, with the placebo and 500 ppm F dentifrices providing significantly less remineralization relative to the 1150 ppm F and 500 ppm F plus fTCP dentifrices. Notably, while CSM measurements for both enamel types generated similar profiles for the four groups, SMH and EFU revealed human enamel was more sensitive to the 500 ppm F dentifrice groups compared to bovine enamel. This apparent sensitivity may be due to the inherent structural differences between the two substrates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outline of protocol used for both human (N=6) and bovine (N=6) enamel substrates treated with each one of the four Dentifrice groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CSM analysis of bovine enamel treated with the four Dentifrice groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CSM analysis of human enamel treated with the four Dentifrice groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arends J, Jongebloed WL. Crystallite dimensions of enamel. J. Biol. Buccale. 1978;6:161–171. - PubMed
    1. Bachmann L, Diebolder R, Hibst R, Zezell DM. Infrared absorption bands of enamel and dentin tissues from human and bovine teeth. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2003;38:1–14.
    1. Dedhiya MG, Young F, Higuchi WI. Mechanism of hydroxyapatite dissolution. The synergistic effects of solution fluoride, strontium, and phosphate. J. Phys. Chem. 1974;78:1273–1279.
    1. Edmunds DH, Whittaker DK, Green RM. Suitability of human, bovine, equine, and ovine tooth enamel for studies of artificial bacterial carious lesions. Caries Res. 1988;22:327–336. - PubMed
    1. Faller RV, Best JM. Anticaries efficacy of an improved stannous fluoride toothpaste. J. Clin. Dent. 1995;6(Spec Issue):89–96. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources