Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;18(4):642-9.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9407-7. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

Influence of CT-based attenuation correction in assessment of left and right ventricular functions with count-based gated blood-pool SPECT

Affiliations

Influence of CT-based attenuation correction in assessment of left and right ventricular functions with count-based gated blood-pool SPECT

Louis Sibille et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Influence of CT-based attenuation correction (CT-AC) in assessment of left and right ventricular functions with count-based gated blood-pool SPECT (GBPS) was evaluated in a mixed population.

Methods: Thirty-two patients (81% male; mean age 56 ± 12) referred for various symptoms or heart diseases were prospectively included. Data from 32 GBPS acquisitions were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm with (IRAC) and without (IRNC) CT-AC and analyzed using previously described segmentation software based on the watershed algorithm. LV and RV EF and volumes were assessed with and without CT-AC and compared.

Results: EF and volumes were correlated (P < .001 for all parameters with r = 0.97 for LV and RV EF; r = 0.96 for LV EDV; r = 0.98 for LV ESV; r = 0.96 for RV EDV and ESV). The mean values using IRAC and IRNC were different for all parameters with lower EF (respectively, 49% ± 19% vs 51 %± 18%; P = .002 for LV EF and 50% ± 14% vs 54%±15%; P < .001 for RV EF) and higher volumes (respectively, 142 ± 41 mL vs 133 ± 40 mL; P < .001 and 79 ± 45 mL vs 71 ± 42 mL; P < .001 for LV EDV and ESV; 91 ± 32 mL vs 86 ± 31 mL; P = .003 and 48 ± 28 mL vs 43 ± 26 mL; P < .001 for RV EDV and ESV). Limits of agreement were -11% to 6% and -11% to 4% for LV and RV EF. We found wider limits of agreement for LV volumes (-13 to 32 mL for EDV and -10 to 27 mL for ESV) than for RV volumes (-13 to 23 mL for EDV and -9 to 20 mL for ESV). Taking into account all volumes, we found a trend with a significant positive correlation between means and differences in volumes assessed with and without CT-AC.

Conclusion: Assessment of both left and right ventricular functions by count-based GBPS with CT-AC showed higher volumes and lower EF. Differences were slight, especially for the range of normal to subnormal ventricular volumes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Nucl Med. 2008 Apr;22(3):171-6 - PubMed
    1. Semin Nucl Med. 2005 Jan;35(1):37-51 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 1992 Oct;33(10):1881-7 - PubMed
    1. Nucl Med Commun. 2006 Nov;27(11):843-52 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jan;37(1):183-8 - PubMed