Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level
- PMID: 21651706
- DOI: 10.1363/4307811
Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level
Abstract
Context: Unintended pregnancy is a key reproductive health indicator, but rates have never been calculated for all 50 states.
Methods: State-level estimates of unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 were calculated using data from several sources. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregnancies was obtained from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and similar state surveys, and the intention status of pregnancies ending in abortion from a national survey of abortion patients. These proportions were applied to birth and abortion counts for each state, and fetal losses were estimated. Rates of unintended pregnancy were obtained by dividing relevant figures by the number of women aged 15-44 in each state. Six states and the District of Columbia had no appropriate survey data; their rates were predicted using multivariate linear regression.
Results: In 2006, the median state unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15-44. Most rates fell within a range of 40-65 unintended pregnancies per 1,000 women. The highest rate was in Mississippi (69); the lowest rate was in New Hampshire (36). Rates were generally highest in the South and Southwest, and in states with large urban populations. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, more than half of pregnancies were unintended; in nine, a consistent upward trend in unintended pregnancy rates between 2002 and 2006 was apparent; no state had a consistent decline.
Conclusions: These rates provide benchmarks for measuring the impact on unintended pregnancy of state policies and practices, such as those governing sex education and the funding of contraceptive services.
Copyright © 2011 by the Guttmacher Institute.
Similar articles
-
Unintended pregnancy in the United States.Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998. PMID: 9494812
-
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8886761
-
The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):94-102. doi: 10.1363/4309411. Epub 2011 May 19. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011. PMID: 21651708
-
Unintended pregnancies: a call for nursing action.MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):24-30; quiz 31. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003. PMID: 12514353 Review.
-
Teen pregnancy prevention: current perspectives.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012 Aug;24(4):462-9. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283555bee. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22790099 Review.
Cited by
-
Support Desired by Women Following Termination of Pregnancy for a Fetal Anomaly.J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):952-60. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9832-x. Epub 2015 Apr 2. J Genet Couns. 2015. PMID: 25828421
-
Availability of over-the-counter emergency contraception in 2 disparate New York City neighborhoods.Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):e45-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300966. Epub 2012 Sep 20. Am J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22994248 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital variation in postpartum tubal sterilization rates in California and Texas.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):152-8. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318278f241. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23262940 Free PMC article.
-
Unintended birth among Hispanic women in Texas: a descriptive analysis.Matern Child Health J. 2015 Jun;19(6):1220-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1626-5. Matern Child Health J. 2015. PMID: 25366101 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy Intention and Post-partum Depressive Affect in Louisiana Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.Matern Child Health J. 2016 May;20(5):1001-13. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1885-9. Matern Child Health J. 2016. PMID: 26649877
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical