Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;20(8):1611-21.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States

Carrie N Klabunde  1 , Kathleen A Cronin, Nancy Breen, William R Waldron, Anita H Ambs, Marion R Nadel
Affiliations

Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States

Carrie N Klabunde et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Evaluating trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use is critical for understanding screening implementation, and whether population groups targeted for screening are receiving it, consistent with guidelines. This study examines recent national trends in CRC test use, including among vulnerable populations.

Methods: We used the 2000, 2003, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Survey to examine national trends in CRC screening use overall and for fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. We also assessed trends by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, income, time in the United States, and access to health care.

Results: During 2000 to 2008, significant declines in FOBT and sigmoidoscopy use and significant increases in colonoscopy use and in the percentages of adults up-to-date with CRC screening occurred overall and for most population subgroups. Subgroups with consistently lower rates of colonoscopy use and being up-to-date included Hispanics; people with minimal education, low income, or no health insurance; recent immigrants; and those with no usual source of care or physician visits in the past year. Among up-to-date adults, there were few subgroup differences in the type of test by which they were up-to-date (i.e., FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy).

Conclusions: Although use of CRC screening and colonoscopy increased among U.S. adults, including those from vulnerable populations, 45% of adults aged 50 to 75-or nearly 35 million people-were not up-to-date with screening in 2008.

Impact: Continued monitoring of CRC screening rates among population subgroups with consistently low utilization is imperative. Improvement in CRC screening rates among all population groups in the United States is still needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Type of Colorectal Cancer Test used by U.S. Adults 50–75 who met Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines1 1Had home FOBT in the past year, sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years, and/or colonoscopy in the past 10 years. 2Data in this panel are restricted to people aged 50–64.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:154–160. - PubMed
    1. DiGuiseppi C, Atkins D, Woolf SH, editors. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services. Second edition. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
    1. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:627–637. - PubMed
    1. Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, Duncan RP, Egede LE, Friedman LS, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:663–667. - PubMed