Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;20(8):1580-98.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0276. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review

Kristen J Wells  1 , John S Luque, Branko Miladinovic, Natalia Vargas, Yasmin Asvat, Richard G Roetzheim, Ambuj Kumar
Affiliations

Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review

Kristen J Wells et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Community health workers (CHW) are lay individuals who are trained to serve as liaisons between members of their communities and health care providers and services.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to synthesize evidence from all prospective controlled studies on effectiveness of CHW programs in improving screening mammography rates. Studies reported in English and conducted in the United States were included if they: (i) evaluated a CHW intervention designed to increase screening mammography rates in women 40 years of age or older without a history of breast cancer; (ii) were a randomized controlled trial (RCT), case-controlled study, or quasi-experimental study; and (iii) evaluated a CHW intervention outside of a hospital setting.

Results: Participation in a CHW intervention was associated with a statistically significant increase in receipt of screening mammography [risk ratio (RR): 1.06 (favoring intervention); 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.003]. The effect remained when pooled data from only RCTs were included in meta-analysis (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.0005) but was not present using pooled data from only quasi-experimental studies (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.18, P = 0.71). In RCTs, participants recruited from medical settings (RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09-1.82, P = 0.008), programs conducted in urban settings (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.39, P = 0.001), and programs where CHWs were matched to intervention participants on race or ethnicity (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.29-1.93, P = 0.0001) showed stronger effects on increasing mammography screening rates.

Conclusions: CHW interventions are effective for increasing screening mammography in certain settings and populations.

Impact: CHW interventions are especially associated with improvements in rate of screening mammography in medical settings, urban settings, and in participants who are racially or ethnically concordant with the CHW.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Diagram of Literature Review Process for Identifying Studies Evaluating Use of Community Health Workers to Improve Screening Mammography Rates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Intervention versus no Intervention, outcome: 1.1 Receipt of mammography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of Intra-Class Correlation Adjustment on Odds Ratio Estimates.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts and Figures 2010. American Cancer Society, Inc; Atlanta: 2010.
    1. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–26. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society [cited 2010 January 23];American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. 2010 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/ped_2_3x_ACS_Cancer_Detection_....
    1. Boyer-Chammard A, Taylor TH, Anton-Culver H. Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer Detect Prevent. 1999;23:463–73. - PubMed
    1. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995;273:149–54. - PubMed

Publication types