Comparative study of attenuation of the pain caused by propofol intravenous injection, by granisetron, magnesium sulfate and nitroglycerine
- PMID: 21655017
- PMCID: PMC3101754
- DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.76511
Comparative study of attenuation of the pain caused by propofol intravenous injection, by granisetron, magnesium sulfate and nitroglycerine
Abstract
Background: Propofol has the disadvantage of causing pain or discomfort on injection. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of pretreatment with various drugs to alleviate the propofol injection pain.
Methods: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II adults, scheduled for various elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia (GA), were included in the study. They were randomly divided into four groups having 25 patients in each group. Group A received pretreatment with intravenous (i.v.) magnesium sulfate, group B received i.v. granisetron, group C received i.v. nitroglycerine and group D was the control group. One-fourth of the total calculated induction dose of propofol was administered over a period of 5 seconds. The patients were asked about the pain on injection. The intensity of pain was assessed using verbal response. A score of 0-3 which corresponds to no, mild, moderate and severe pain was recorded.
Results: All the three drugs reduced the incidence and intensity of pain on propofol injection but the order of efficacy in attenuation of pain on the propofol injection was granisetron > nitroglycerine > magnesium sulfate > control.
Conclusion: Granisetron was the most effective followed by nitroglycerine and magnesium sulfate in attenuating pain on propofol intravenous injection.
Keywords: Granisetron; magnesium sulphate; nitroglycerine; pain on injection; propofol.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Smith I, White PF, Nathansun M, Gouldson R. Propofol: An update on its clinical use. Anaesthesiology. 1994;81:1005–43. - PubMed
-
- Macario A, Wringer M, Truong P, Lee M. Which clinical anaesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid. The perspective of a panel of expert anaesthesiologists? Anaesth Analg. 1999;88:1085–91. - PubMed
-
- Stark RD, Binks S, Dutka VN, Arnstein MJ, Glen JB. A review of the safety and tolerance of propofol. Postgrad Med J. 1955;3:152–6. - PubMed
-
- Mangar D, Holak EJ. Tourniquet at 50 mmHg followed by intravenous lidocaine diminishes hand pain associated with propofol injection. Anaesth Analg. 1992;74:250–2. - PubMed
-
- Valtonen M, Lisalo E, Kanto J, Rosenberg P. Propofol as an induction agent in children: Pain on injection and pharmacokinetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989;33:152–5. - PubMed