Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jun;25(3):151-5.
doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.3.151. Epub 2011 May 24.

Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes

Young Rae Roh et al. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the IOLMaster and four different IOL power calculation formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK II, and SRK/T) for cataract surgery in eyes with a short axial length (AL).

Methods: The present study was a retrospective comparative analysis which included 25 eyes with an AL shorter than 22.0 mm that underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation from July 2007 to December 2008 at Seoul National University Boramae Hospital. Preoperative AL and keratometric power were measured by the IOLMaster, and power of the implanted IOL was determined using Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK II, and SRK/T formulas. Postoperative refractive errors two months after surgery were measured using automatic refracto-keratometry (Nidek) and were compared with the predicted postoperative power. The mean absolute error (MAE) was defined as the average of the absolute value of the difference between actual and predicted spherical equivalences of postoperative refractive error.

Results: The MAE was smallest with the Haigis formula (0.37 ± 0.26 diopter [D]), followed by those of SRK/T (0.53 ± 0.25 D), SRK II (0.56 ± 0.20 D), and Hoffer Q (0.62 ± 0.16 D) in 25 eyes with an AL shorter than 22.0 mm. The proportion with an absolute error (AE) of less than 1 D was greatest in the Haigis formula (96%), followed by those in the SRK II (88%), SRK-T (84%), and Hoffer Q (80%).

Conclusions: The MAE was less than 0.7 D and the proportion of AE less than 1 D was more than 80% in all formulas. The IOL power calculation using the Haigis formula showed the best results for postoperative power prediction in short eyes.

Keywords: IOLMaster; Intraocular lens power calculation; Short eyes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Means and standard deviations of the absolute errors the four intraocular lens calculation formulas.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of the absolute errors (AE) less than 1 diopter (D) according to the intraocular lens formulas.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationships between axial length and anterior chamber depth (ACD). Dots represent data points (linear regression analysis).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Means and standard deviations of the mean errors of the four intraocular lens calculation formulas.

References

    1. Kershner RM. Sutureless one-handed intercapsular phacoemulsification. The keyhole technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;17(Suppl):719–725. - PubMed
    1. Olsen T, Dam-Johansen M, Bek T, Hjortdal JO. Evaluating surgically induced astigmatism by Fourier analysis of corneal topography data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:318–323. - PubMed
    1. Olson RJ, Crandall AS. Prospective randomized comparison of phacoemulsification cataract surgery with a 3.2-mm vs a 5.5-mm sutureless incision. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:612–620. - PubMed
    1. Kohnen T. Multifocal IOL technology: a successful step on the journey toward presbyopia treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:2005. - PubMed
    1. Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:13–17. - PubMed

Publication types