Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 May;8(5):1671-91.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051671. Epub 2011 May 20.

How do price minimizing behaviors impact smoking cessation? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

How do price minimizing behaviors impact smoking cessation? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

Andrea S Licht et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 May.

Abstract

This paper examines how price minimizing behaviors impact efforts to stop smoking. Data on 4,988 participants from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Four-Country Survey who were smokers at baseline (wave 5) and interviewed at a 1 year follow-up were used. We examined whether price minimizing behaviors at baseline predicted: (1) cessation, (2) quit attempts, and (3) successful quit attempts at one year follow up using multivariate logistic regression modeling. A subset analysis included 3,387 participants who were current smokers at waves 5 and 6 and were followed through wave 7 to explore effects of changing purchase patterns on cessation. Statistical tests for interaction were performed to examine the joint effect of SES and price/tax avoidance behaviors on cessation outcomes. Smokers who engaged in any price/tax avoidance behaviors were 28% less likely to report cessation. Persons using low/untaxed sources were less likely to quit at follow up, those purchasing cartons were less likely to make quit attempts and quit, and those using discount cigarettes were less likely to succeed, conditional on making attempts. Respondents who utilized multiple behaviors simultaneously were less likely to make quit attempts and to succeed. SES did not modify the effects of price minimizing behaviors on cessation outcomes. The data from this paper indicate that the availability of lower priced cigarette alternatives may attenuate public health efforts aimed at to reduce reducing smoking prevalence through price and tax increases among all SES groups.

Keywords: cessation; policy; price; socio-economic status; tax; tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Modified Compensatory Model of Price effects in response to a price or tax increase.

References

    1. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ. Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and the Economics of Tobacco. The World Bank; Washington, DC, USA: 1999.
    1. Levy DT, Cummings KM, Hyland A. Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: Results of a simulation model. Prev. Med. 2000;31:279–286. - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The Economics of Smoking. In: Culyer CJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of Health Economics. 1st ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2000. pp. 1539–1627. Volume 1.
    1. Frieden TR, Mostashari F, Kerker BD, Miller N, Hajat A, Frankel M. Adult tobacco use levels after intensive tobacco control measures: New York City, 2002–2003. Amer. J. Public Health. 2005;95:1016–1023. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka FJ, Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK. Tax, price and cigarette smoking: Evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies. Tob. Control. 2002;11:i62–i72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types