Clinimetrics corner: the many faces of selection bias
- PMID: 21655388
- PMCID: PMC3101070
- DOI: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712699
Clinimetrics corner: the many faces of selection bias
Abstract
Selection bias, also known as susceptibility bias in an intervention study or spectrum bias in a diagnostic accuracy study, is present throughout clinically applicable evidence in various forms. Selection bias implies that the intervention or diagnostic test has been studied in a less representative sample population, which can lead to inflated overall effect sizes and/or inaccurate findings. Within the literature, there are over 40 forms of selection bias that can influence the external validity of results. Recognition of selection bias is essential in the translation of evidence into effective clinical practice. This clinimetrics corner outlines the major biases that readers encounter and discusses key examples regarding pertinent orthopedic and manual therapy literature.
Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; External validity; Selection bias; Spectrum effect.
References
-
- Stang A. Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23:761–5 - PubMed
-
- Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7–18 - PubMed
-
- Hartman JM, Forsen JW, Jr, Wallace MS, Neely JG, Tutorials in clinical research: Part IV: recognizing and controlling bias. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:23–31 - PubMed
-
- Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282:1061–6 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources