Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 11;75(3):50.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe75350.

Professional technical standards in colleges and schools of pharmacy

Affiliations

Professional technical standards in colleges and schools of pharmacy

Tricia M Berry et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence, characteristics, and use of professional technical standards among colleges and schools of pharmacy accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE).

Methods: The Web site of every college and school of pharmacy accredited by ACPE was searched to identify information regarding the availability, content, and use of technical standards and to obtain demographic information.

Results: Information was obtained from all of the 114 colleges and schools of pharmacy and 67 (59%) had technical standards in place. Common themes for technical standards were: observation; communication; motor; intellectual, conceptual, integrative and quantitative abilities; and behavioral and social attributes. Of those colleges and schools with technical standards, 61 (91%) had standards that addressed all 5 of these themes and 34 (51%) specified that the technical standards were used in their admission, progression, and graduation procedures.

Conclusion: More than half of the colleges and schools of pharmacy examined in this study have technical standards; however, 41% have yet to develop and implement them. Colleges and schools of pharmacy looking for guidance in technical standards development could use the technical standards themes identified in this study.

Keywords: accreditation; admission; disability; technical standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for the Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree (Guidelines Version 2.0). http://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/FinalS2007Guidelines2.0.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2011.
    1. Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S 397 (1979)
    1. Doe v. New York University, 666 F. 2d 761 (1981)
    1. Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Case Western Reserve University, 666 N.E. 2d 1376 (1996)
    1. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. 29 U.S.C. § 793.

LinkOut - more resources