Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;66(4):635-9.
doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000400019.

Functional outcomes of conservatively treated clavicle fractures

Affiliations

Functional outcomes of conservatively treated clavicle fractures

Mohd Yazid Bajuri et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011.

Abstract

Objective: The main aim of the study was to analyze the outcomes of clavicle fractures in adults treated non-surgically and to evaluate the clinical effects of displacement, fracture patterns, fracture location, fracture comminution, shortening and fracture union on shoulder function.

Methods: Seventy clavicle fractures were non-surgically treated in the Orthopedics Department at the Tuanku Ja'afar General Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Seremban, Malaysia, an average of six months after injury. The clavicle fractures were treated conservatively with an arm sling and a figure-eight splint for three weeks. No attempt was made to reduce displaced fractures, and the patients were allowed immediate free-shoulder mobilization, as tolerated. They were prospectively evaluated clinically and radiographically. Shoulder function was evaluated using the Constant scoring technique.

Results: There were statistically significant functional outcome impairments in non-surgically treated clavicle fractures that correlated with the fracture type (comminution), the fracture displacement (21 mm or more), shortening (15 mm or more) and the fracture union (malunion).

Conclusion: This article reveals the need for surgical intervention to treat clavicle fractures and improve shoulder functional outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clavicle fracture location and Constant score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clavicle fracture type and Constant score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Clavicle fracture displacement and Constant score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Clavicle fracture shortening and Constant score.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Clavicle fracture unity and Constant score.
Chart 1
Chart 1
Shoulder status after a non-surgical treatment of a clavicle fracture.

References

    1. Keener JD, Dahners LE. Percutaneous Pinning of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures. Techniques Shoulder & Elbow Surgery. 2006;7:175–81. 10.1097/01.bte.0000235402.67223.41 - DOI
    1. Collinge C, Devinney S, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R. Anterior-inferior Plate Fixation of Middle-third Fractures and Nonunions of the Clavicle. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:680–6. 10.1097/01.bot.0000249434.57571.29 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pope R. Clavicle fracture management conservative versus operative. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002:84-B Suppl III: 214.
    1. Celestre P, Roberston C, Mahar A, Oka R, Meunier M, Schwartz A. Biomechanical Evaluation of Clavicle Fracture Plating Techniques: Does a Locking Plate Provide Improved Stability. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:241–7. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816c7bac - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007;89:1–10. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources