Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;21(3):325-34.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9317-1.

Long-term health and work outcomes of renal transplantation and patterns of work status during the end-stage renal disease trajectory

Affiliations

Long-term health and work outcomes of renal transplantation and patterns of work status during the end-stage renal disease trajectory

Sijrike F van der Mei et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to examine the health- and work outcomes of renal transplant recipients long-term after transplantation as well as the pattern of work status, work ability and disability benefits during the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) trajectory that precedes transplantation.

Methods: 34 transplant recipients completed interviews 3, 13 months and >6 years posttransplantation. Health status (SF-36), work ability (WAI), and fatigue (CIS) were assessed by questionnaires, clinical data were derived from medical charts, and data on functional limitations were extracted from the social security system database. The work status trajectory preceding transplantation was examined retrospectively.

Results: Of the 34 third wave transplant recipients, 29% were severely fatigued. Compared with the general working population, recipients experienced worse general health and less vitality. Non-working recipients had worse renal function and general health, and more limitations in physical functioning compared to working recipients. The WAI score indicated moderate work ability for 60% of the employed recipients. Although 67% were employed (45% parttime), 30% of those working still received some disability benefits. Social insurance physicians found variable levels of functional limitations. The mean work status trajectory showed more sickness absence and less work ability during dialysis, but after transplantation, both work status and work ability generally improved.

Conclusions: Transplant recipients have a compromised health status which leads to functional limitations and disability. Although work status improved after transplantation, a substantial number of the transplant recipients received disability benefits. The negative health consequences of anti-rejection medications may play an important role in long-term work ability. These results indicate that a 'new' kidney has advantages over dialysis with respect to work, but does not necessarily leads to 'normal' work outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of inclusion, eligibility and follow-up of renal transplant recipients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pattern of work status and disability benefits of the third wave study group during the ESRD disease trajectory (18–64 years). Tx transplantation. The sample size (n) at each time point is based on the number of patients aged 18–64 years, full-time students excluded (at diagnosis, n = 6 <18 years, n = 1 ≥65 years, n = 4 full-time students; at start dialysis, n = 1 <18 years, n = 1 ≥65 years; at Tx and 1 year post-Tx, n = 1 ≥65 years, n = 1 full-time student; at 6 years post-Tx, n = 4 ≥65 years)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Work ability of the third wave study group during the ESRD trajectory (n = 34)

References

    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1725–1730. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan B, Meier-Kriesche HU. Renal transplantation: a half century of success and the long road ahead. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:3270–3271. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000146569.59482.8C. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodman WG, Danovitch GM. Options for patients with end-stage renal disease. In: Danovitch GM, editor. Handbook of kidney transplantation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. pp. 1–16.
    1. Luk WS. The HRQoL of renal transplant patients. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13:201–209. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00867.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen D, Galbraith C. General health management and long-term care of the renal transplant recipient. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:S10–S24. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.28922. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types