Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;91(9):813-22.
doi: 10.1002/bdra.20836. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

Microtia-anotia: a global review of prevalence rates

Daniela Varela Luquetti  1 , Emanuele Leoncini, Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo
Affiliations

Microtia-anotia: a global review of prevalence rates

Daniela Varela Luquetti et al. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Background: There are few published studies on microtia-anotia frequency.

Methods: Using data from birth defects surveillance programs around the world, we conducted a systematic review on the frequency of microtia-anotia to further explore the differences in prevalence across countries. Ninety-two birth defects surveillance programs were evaluated with a total of 8917 cases of microtia-anotia. We computed the prevalence per 10,000 births for each surveillance program for total cases of microtia-anotia (microtia types I to IV), microtia (types I to III), and anotia (type IV). Prevalence ratios were calculated by large geographic areas, race/ethnicity, and by surveillance methodologies.

Results: The overall prevalences were: microtia-anotia, 2.06 (confidence interval [CI], 2.02-2.10); microtia, 1.55 (CI, 1.50-1.60); and anotia 0.36 (CI, 0.34-0.38). Higher prevalences were observed for the Americas, Northern Europe and Asia, among Hispanics and Asians, and among active ascertainment and hospital-based surveillance programs.

Conclusions: We observed marked variation in the prevalence of microtia-anotia across surveillance programs and within countries. These results must be interpreted cautiously as this variability may be explained mainly by differences in surveillance methods. However, given the magnitude of some of the differences, other factors may also be involved. This study contributes to the knowledge of the prevalence of microtia-anotia by providing a critical analysis of the existing data. In addition, it supports the need for a coding system that allows complete phenotype characterization of microtia-anotia, including severity and laterality, as well as for further studies on the variation of its frequency related to race and ethnicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence (per 10,000 births) of microtia across surveillance programs * Zero case
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence (per 10,000 births) of anotia across surveillance programs * Zero case
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence (per 10,000 births) of anotia across surveillance programs * Zero case
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aase JM, Tegtmeier RE. Microtia in New Mexico: evidence for multifactorial causation. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(3A):113–116. - PubMed
    1. Alasti F, Van Camp G. Genetics of microtia and associated syndromes. J Med Genet. 2009;46(6):361–369. - PubMed
    1. Anderka MT, Lin AE, Abuelo DN, et al. Reviewing the evidence for mycophenolate mofetil as a new teratogen: case report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(6):1241–1248. - PubMed
    1. Artunduaga MA, Quintanilla-Dieck MD, Greenway S, et al. A Classic Twin Study of External Ear Malformations, Including Microtia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1216–1218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balci S. Familial microtia with meatal atresia in father and son. Turk J Pediatr. 1974;16(3):140–143. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources