Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jun;68(6):594-8.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318218f32a.

Scalp defect repair: a comparative analysis of different surgical techniques

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Scalp defect repair: a comparative analysis of different surgical techniques

Cornelia Katharina Mueller et al. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Scalp defects often arise in multimorbid patients. This study aimed at establishing an algorithm of defect repair with particular focus on new regenerative options.All patients, who consulted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, University Jena between April 2005 and March 2010 were reviewed. Different reconstructive options were compared with regard to duration of hospital stay as well as rate of reoperations needed to achieve full closure.Sixty-eight patients were identified. Local flaps were more effective than skin grafts (P = 0.038) and microvascular free flaps (P = 0.037) in case of skin-galea-periosteal-defects. However, no differences were found between skin grafting in combination with wound bed preconditioning using a dermal regeneration template and microvascular free flap transfer. Scalp defects should be repaired based on careful evaluation of defect anatomy as well as patient's general health. Application of dermal regeneration templates allows for an increase of the indication spectrum of free skin grafts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types