Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;22(5):731-7.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182227887.

Folic acid intake and spina bifida in the era of dietary folic acid fortification

Katherine Ahrens  1 , Mahsa M Yazdy, Allen A Mitchell, Martha M Werler
Affiliations

Folic acid intake and spina bifida in the era of dietary folic acid fortification

Katherine Ahrens et al. Epidemiology. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration mandated that enriched grain products be fortified with folic acid by 1998. We evaluated whether intake of folic acid from supplements and diet was associated with a reduction in spina bifida in the setting of folic acid fortification.

Methods: Data were collected as part of the Slone Birth Defects Study from 1998 to 2008. Mothers of infants with and without birth defects were interviewed within 6 months of delivery about pregnancy exposures, including details of diet and vitamin intake. Dietary natural folate and synthetic folic acid from fortification were combined into a single, weighted measure--dietary folate equivalent. Periconceptional folic acid supplementation and dietary folate consumption were compared between 205 mothers of spina bifida cases and 6357 mothers of nonmalformed controls. Relative risks of a spina bifida-affected birth were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Spina bifida was not associated with regular folic acid supplementation (≥4 days per week) either around the time of conception (adjusted OR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.74-1.7]) or initiated in early pregnancy (0.79 [0.54-1.2]). After adjustment for confounders, a 13% reduced odds of spina bifida was estimated for each 100-μg increase in daily dietary folate equivalent consumed.

Conclusions: In the setting of folic acid fortification of grains, our data suggest that folic acid supplementation does not appear to offer further benefit for reducing risk of spina bifida. Rather, the folate-associated benefit on spina bifida risk was found with increasing amounts of dietary folic acid consumed, regardless of folic acid supplementation level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Adjusted spline (solid line) of daily intake of dietary folate equivalent on risk of spina bifida for all women with diet history (n = 6099). Also shown is 95% CI (dashed line). Reference value is 500 µg/day dietary folate equivalent (50th percentile value in controls).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Food standards: amendment of standards of identity for enriched grain products to require addition of folic acid. Fed Regist. 1996;61:8781–8807.
    1. Mersereau P, Kilker K, Carter H, et al. Spina bifida and anencephaly before and after folic acid mandate—United States, 1995–1996 and 1999–2000. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:362–365. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations for the use of folic acid to reduce the number of cases of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992;42(RR-14):1–7. - PubMed
    1. Mosley B, Cleves M, Siega-Riz A, et al. Neural tube defects and maternal folate intake among pregnancies conceived after folic acid fortification in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nurses’ Health Study. Questionnaire. 1998 Available at: http://www.channing.harvard.edu/nhs/questionnaires/pdfs/NHSI/1998.PDF.

Publication types