Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Aug;144(2):244-53.
doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041440210.

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding to human fibroblast and glioblastoma cells: the modulating effect of cell released IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs)

Affiliations

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding to human fibroblast and glioblastoma cells: the modulating effect of cell released IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs)

R H McCusker et al. J Cell Physiol. 1990 Aug.

Abstract

The cell surface of human fibroblasts contains not only type I IGF receptors but at least two forms of IGFBPs. Studies were undertaken to analyze the mechanisms by which these IGFBPs alter IGF-I-cell surface interactions. Human fetal fibroblasts (GM10) and a human glioblastoma cell line (1690) were chosen for analysis. During assays to quantify [125I]-IGF-I binding, both cell lines were shown to release IGFBPs into the binding assay buffer. Under equilibrium conditions, [125I]-IGF-I preferentially associates with IGFBPs in the assay buffer (up to 40% of the [125I]-IGF-I added) since they have a higher affinity than type I IGF receptors or IGFBPs associated with the cell surface. Likewise the addition of increasing concentrations of unlabeled IGF-I results in preferential competition for binding to assay buffer IGFBPs. This results in a repartitioning of the [125I]-IGF-I that is bound to assay buffer IGFBPs onto cell surface binding sites. The degree of repartitioning is quantitatively related to the amount of [125I]-IGF-I bound to released IGFBPs. When cultures are exposed to cycloheximide before the binding assay, both the amount of IGFBPs that are released into the assay buffer and the amount of [125I]-IGF-I that is repartitioned are decreased. In contrast when [Gln3, Ala4, Tyr15, Leu16]-IGF-I ([QAYL]-IGF-I, an IGF analog that has unaltered affinity for type I IGF receptors) is iodinated and tested, the competition curve with unlabeled IGF-I shows no repartitioning effect. This form of IGF can be used to quantify type I receptor number independent of the presence of IGFBPs. IGF-I and the [QAYL]-IGF-I compete equally with the [125I]-[QAYL]-IGF-I for binding to cell surfaces, whereas unlabeled [QAYL]-IGF-I is greater than 25-fold less potent compared to IGF-I in competing with [125I]-IGF-I for cell surface binding. Specific binding of [125I]-[QAYL]-IGF-I to GM10 and 1690 cell surfaces is less than 20% of [125I]-IGF-I binding. These findings suggest that IGFBPs that are present on human fibroblast surfaces represent a large portion of the IGF binding sites. We conclude that the amount of IGFBPs released into assay buffer is a major determinant of the repartitioning of [125I]-IGF-I to cell surface binding sites and that both cell surface and assay buffer IGFBPs modulate type I IGF receptor binding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources