Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):681-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study

Claudia Herrera Siklódy et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: We compared the safety of different devices by screening for subclinical intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation with either conventional irrigated radiofrequency (RF) or cryoballoon or multielectrode phased RF pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC).

Background: New devices specifically designed to facilitate pulmonary vein isolation procedures have recently been introduced.

Methods: This prospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation referred for pulmonary vein isolation. Ablation was performed using 1 of the 3 catheters. Strict periprocedural anticoagulation, with intravenous heparin during ablation to achieve an activated clotting time >300 s, was ensured in all patients. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after ablation.

Results: Seventy-four patients were included in the study: 27 in the irrigated RF group, 23 in the cryoballoon group, and 24 in the PVAC group. Total procedure times were 198 ± 50 min, 174 ± 35 min, and 124 ± 32 min, respectively (p < 0.001 for PVAC vs. irrigated RF and cryoballoon). Findings on neurological examination were normal in all patients before and after ablation. Post-procedure magnetic resonance imaging detected a single new embolic lesion in 2 of 27 patients in the irrigated RF group (7.4%) and in 1 of 23 in the cryoballoon group (4.3%). However, in the PVAC group 9 of 24 patients (37.5%) demonstrated 2.7 ± 1.3 new lesions each (p = 0.003 for the presence of new embolic events among the 3 groups).

Conclusions: The PVAC is associated with a significantly higher incidence of subclinical intracranial embolic events. Further study of the causes and significance of these emboli is required to determine the safety of the PVAC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types