Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;115(4):836-43.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318221fcc9.

Perineural dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in rats prolongs the duration of analgesia by blocking the hyperpolarization-activated cation current

Affiliations

Perineural dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in rats prolongs the duration of analgesia by blocking the hyperpolarization-activated cation current

Chad M Brummett et al. Anesthesiology. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The current study was designed to test the hypothesis that the increased duration of analgesia caused by adding dexmedetomidine to local anesthetic results from blockade of the hyperpolarization-activated cation (I(h)) current.

Methods: In this randomized, blinded, controlled study, the analgesic effects of peripheral nerve blocks using 0.5% ropivacaine alone or 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (34 μM or 6 μg/kg) were assessed with or without the pretreatment of α(1)- and α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists (prazosin and idazoxan, respectively) and antagonists and agonists of the I(h) current (ZD 7288 and forskolin, respectively). Sciatic nerve blocks were performed, and analgesia was measured by paw withdrawal latency to a thermal stimulus every 30 min for 300 min postblock.

Results: The analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine was not reversed by either prazosin or idazoxan. There were no additive or attenuated effects from the pretreatment with ZD 7288 (I(h) current blocker) compared with dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine. When forskolin was administered as a pretreatment to ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine, there were statistically significant reductions in duration of analgesia at time points 90-180 min (P < 0.0001 for each individual comparison). The duration of blockade for the forskolin (768 μM) followed by ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine group mirrored the pattern of the ropivacaine alone group, thereby implying a reversal effect.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine caused approximately a 75% increase in the duration of analgesia, which was reversed by pretreatment with an I(h) current enhancer. The analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine was not reversed by an α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Prazosin and Idazoxan Did Not Attenuate the Analgesic Effects of Perineural Dexmedetomidine Added to Ropivacaine
Each rat received a pretreatment perineural injection followed by a second injection 10 min later. The duration of sensory blockade was measured by assessing paw withdrawal latency (PWL) to a heat stimulus every 30 min following the nerve block with a maximum response of 15 s. All of the groups containing dexmedetomidine plus ropivacaine had a longer duration of sensory blockade when compared with ropivacaine alone. Groups are noted in the upper right by the “Pretreatment/Second Injection.” ∝ = 0.00833 * indicates a significant difference for all three DEX groups when compared with the Saline/Ropiv control group. + indicates Saline/DEX+Ropiv and Prazosin/DEX+Ropiv are each significantly different from the Saline/Ropiv control group. # indicates Prazosin/DEX+Ropiv significantly differs from both Idazoxan/DEX+Ropiv and the Saline/Ropiv control group. BL = baseline; DEX = dexmedetomidine; Ropiv = ropivacaine
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Ih Blocker ZD 7288 Did Not Increase the Duration of Dexmedetomidine-Mediated Analgesia
The duration of the sciatic nerve block was measured by paw withdrawal latency (PWL) to a thermal stimulus every 30 min. Both ZD 7288 and dexmedetomidine increased the duration of sensory blockade when compared with the Saline/Ropivacaine control group. There was no additive effect when both ZD 7288 and dexmedetomidine were coadministered with ropivacaine. Groups are noted in the upper right by the “Pretreatment/Second Injection.” ∝ = 0.00833 * indicates the Saline/Ropiv control group is significantly different from the other three groups. At 150 min, there is also a significant difference between Saline/DEX+Ropiv and ZD 7288/Ropiv. # indicates Saline/DEX+Ropiv and ZD 7288/Ropiv are each significantly different from the Saline/Ropiv control group. BL = baseline; DEX = dexmedetomidine; Ropiv = ropivacaine
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forskolin Attenuated the Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine Added to Ropivacaine
When the Ih agonist, forskolin, was given as a pretreatment to the dexmedetomidine plus ropivacaine combination, the duration of analgesia mirrored that of ropivacaine alone and was significantly different than the Saline/DEX+Ropiv group. Forskolin pretreatment also attenuated the analgesic effects of ropivacaine alone, as noted by the differences between the Forskolin/Ropiv and Saline/Ropiv groups. Groups are noted in the upper right by the “Pretreatment/Second Injection.” ∝ = 0.00833 # indicates that the Forskolin/Ropiv group is significantly different from the other three groups. + indicates that the Saline/Ropiv control group is significantly different from the other three groups. Forskolin/Ropiv is also significantly different from the remaining two groups. * indicates that the Saline/DEX+Ropiv group is significantly different from the other three groups. At 120 min, there is also a significant difference between the two Forskolin groups. BL = baseline; DEX = dexmedetomidine; PWL = paw withdrawal latency; Ropiv = ropivacaine

References

    1. Casati A, Fanelli G, Albertin A, Deni F, Anelati D, Antonino FA, Beccaria P. Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia with either 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine. Minerva Anestesiol. 2000;66:39–44. - PubMed
    1. Casati A, Fanelli G, Aldegheri G, Berti M, Colnaghi E, Cedrati V, Torri G. Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 0.5%, 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine: A double-blind comparison with 2% mepivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:872–5. - PubMed
    1. Apfelbaum JL, Gan TJ, Zhao S, Hanna DB, Chen C. Reliability and validity of the perioperative opioid-related symptom distress scale. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:699–709. - PubMed
    1. Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA. In: Neurochemical mechanisms mediating opioid-induced REM sleep disruption, Sleep and Pain. Lavigne G, Sessle BJ, Choiniere M, Soja PJ, editors. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Press; 2007. pp. 99–122.
    1. Brummett CM, Amodeo FS, Janda AM, Padda AK, Lydic R. Perineural dexmedetomidine provides an increased duration of analgesia to a thermal stimulus when compared with a systemic control in a rat sciatic nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:427–31. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms