Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;88(10):E1240-4.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318223bf20.

Corneal sublayer thickness measurements with the Nidek ConfoScan 4 (z Ring)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Corneal sublayer thickness measurements with the Nidek ConfoScan 4 (z Ring)

Ka Yin Chan et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the repeatability of corneal sublayer thickness measurements using the Nidek ConfoScan 4 (CS4) with the z ring on a group of young adult subjects.

Methods: Thirty subjects aged 18 to 30 years were invited to have thickness measurements with the CS4 (z ring) on two different days, at similar time of the day to avoid diurnal variation.

Results: Only 22 subjects had valid measurements for analysis. The mean ± SD of central corneal thickness (CCT) was 534 ± 26 μm, epithelial thickness was 42 ± 8 μm, Bowman's layer thickness was 19 ± 7 μm, and stromal thickness (ST) was 472 ± 25 μm. There was no significant difference in the between-visit thickness measurements of each layer with the CS4 (z ring) (paired t-tests, p > 0.05). The limits of agreement of between-visit measurements were -41 (8%) to 37 μm (7%) for CCT, -21 (50%) to 19 μm (45%) for epithelial thickness, -13 (68%) to 17 μm (89%) for Bowman layer thickness, and -46 (10%) to 37 μm (8%) for ST.

Conclusions: Measurements of CCT and ST with the CS4 (z ring) showed reasonably good repeatability (7 to 10%). However, the repeatability of measurements of the thinner corneal layers, such as epithelium and Bowman's layer, was poor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources