Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Aug;11(8):1563-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03579.x. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

Liver ischemia and reperfusion injury: new insights into mechanisms of innate-adaptive immune-mediated tissue inflammation

Affiliations
Review

Liver ischemia and reperfusion injury: new insights into mechanisms of innate-adaptive immune-mediated tissue inflammation

Y Zhai et al. Am J Transplant. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) is a dynamic process that involves two distinctive yet interrelated phases of ischemic organ damage and inflammation-mediated reperfusion injury. Although multiple cellular and molecular pathways contribute and regulate tissue/organ damage, integration of different players into a unified mechanism is warranted. The crosstalk between innate and adaptive immune systems plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of liver IRI. In this review, we focus on recent progress in the mechanism of liver innate immune activation by IR. Kupffer cells (KC), DCs, NK, as well as T cells initiate local inflammation response, the hallmark of IRI, by utilizing distinctive immune receptors to recognize and/or trigger various molecules, both endogenous and exogenous. The interlocked molecular signaling pathways in the context of multiple liver cell types, the IRI kinetics and positive versus negative regulatory loops in the innate immune activation process are discussed. Better appreciation of molecular interactions that mediate these intricate cascades, should allow for the development of novel therapeutic approached against IRI in liver transplant recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose, as described by the American Journal of Transplantation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distinctive stages of liver IRI
The ischemic injury, a localized process of hepatic metabolic disturbances, results from glycogen consumption, lack of oxygen supply, and ATP depletion. In the reperfusion injury, an immune activation-mediated amplification process, DAMPs (alarmins) produced during the initial cellular insult, trigger liver non-parenchymal cells (NPC) to generate the pro-inflammatory milieu, which damage the liver tissue directly or indirectly by activating neutrophils and recruiting immune cells from the circulation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. An integrated mechanistic scheme of liver immune activation against IRI
In the first phase of liver IRI, the ischemia insult induces necrotic cell death, which in turn provide diverse “danger” molecules, such as HMGB1 and DNA fragments to activate innate TLR4, RAGE and TLR9 signaling on KCs/DCs and neutrophils. T cells, particularly CD4 Th1 effectors, may also facilitate local innate immune activation via CD154-CD40 pathway. In the second phase of liver IRI, IFN-γ produced by T cells, NKT and NK cells enhances innate immune activation. In addition, CD1d and CD39 activate NKT and NK cells, respectively. The activation progresses via positive and negative regulatory loops. The pro-inflammatory milieu, composed of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, CXCL10, CCL2, CXCL8 and ROS, further activates local and recruits circulating immune cells, which promote cytotoxicity against liver parenchymal cells. Meanwhile, IL-10 counter-regulates the sustained pro-inflammatory activation, whereas adenosine receptor 2A inhibits NKT cell activation. Type II NKT cells may also down-regulate IFN-γ production by pro-inflammatory type I NKT cells.

References

    1. Fondevila C, Busuttil RW, Kupiec-Weglinski JW. Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury--a fresh look. Exp Mol Pathol. 2003;74(2):86–93. - PubMed
    1. Henderson JM. Liver transplantation and rejection: an overview. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 1999;46 (Suppl 2):1482–1484. - PubMed
    1. Howard TK, Klintmalm GB, Cofer JB, Husberg BS, Goldstein RM, Gonwa TA. The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient. Transplantation. 1990;49(1):103–107. - PubMed
    1. Ikeda T, Yanaga K, Kishikawa K, Kakizoe S, Shimada M, Sugimachi K. Ischemic injury in liver transplantation: difference in injury sites between warm and cold ischemia in rats. Hepatology. 1992;16(2):454–461. - PubMed
    1. Huet PM, Nagaoka MR, Desbiens G, Tarrab E, Brault A, Bralet MP, et al. Sinusoidal endothelial cell and hepatocyte death following cold ischemia-warm reperfusion of the rat liver. Hepatology. 2004;39(4):1110–1119. - PubMed