Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;68(6):761-7.
doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.101.

Outcomes of mild cognitive impairment by definition: a population study

Mary Ganguli  1 , Beth E Snitz, Judith A Saxton, Chung-Chou H Chang, Ching-Wen Lee, Joni Vander Bilt, Tiffany F Hughes, David A Loewenstein, Frederick W Unverzagt, Ronald C Petersen
Affiliations

Outcomes of mild cognitive impairment by definition: a population study

Mary Ganguli et al. Arch Neurol. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been defined in several ways.

Objective: To determine the 1-year outcomes of MCI by different definitions at the population level.

Design: Inception cohort with 1-year follow-up. Participants were classified as having MCI using the following definitions operationalized for this study: amnestic MCI by Mayo criteria, expanded MCI by International Working Group criteria, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5, and a purely cognitive classification into amnestic and nonamnestic MCI.

Setting: General community.

Participants: Stratified random population-based sample of 1982 individuals 65 years and older.

Main outcome measures: For each MCI definition, there were 3 possible outcomes: worsening (progression to dementia [CDR ≥ 1] or severe cognitive impairment), improvement (reversion to CDR = 0 or normal cognition), and stability (unchanged CDR or cognitive status).

Results: Regardless of MCI definition, over 1 year, a small proportion of participants progressed to CDR > 1 (range, 0%-3%) or severe cognitive impairment (0%-20%) at rates higher than their cognitively normal peers. Somewhat larger proportions of participants improved or reverted to normal (6%-53%). Most participants remained stable (29%-92%). Where definitions focused on memory impairment and on multiple cognitive domains, higher proportions progressed and lower proportions reverted on the CDR.

Conclusions: As ascertained by several operational definitions, MCI is a heterogeneous entity at the population level but progresses to dementia at rates higher than in normal elderly individuals. Proportions of participants progressing to dementia are lower and proportions reverting to normal are higher than in clinical populations. Memory impairments and impairments in multiple domains lead to greater progression and lesser improvement. Research criteria may benefit from validation at the community level before incorporation into clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment-clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303–306. - PubMed
    1. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild Cognitive Impairment - beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2004;256:240–246. (2004). - PubMed
    1. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412–2414. - PubMed
    1. Saxton J, Snitz BE, Lopez OL, et al. Functional and cognitive criteria produce different rates of mild cognitive impairment and conversion to dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:737–743. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jak AJ, Bondi MW, Delano-Wood L, et al. Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17:368–375. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms