Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;16(7):935-41.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0022. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

Current knowledge on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with sporadic breast cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current knowledge on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with sporadic breast cancer

Abenaa M Brewster et al. Oncologist. 2011.

Abstract

The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in the U.S. among patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer increased by 150% from 1993 to 2003. Although CPM has been shown to reduce the risk for developing contralateral breast cancer, there is conflicting evidence on whether or not it reduces breast cancer mortality or overall death. The increase in the CPM rate is especially concerning among women with early-stage sporadic breast cancer who have a minimal annual risk for developing contralateral breast cancer, and for many of these women the risk for distant metastatic disease outweighs the risk for contralateral breast cancer. The lack of information about the clinical value of CPM in women with sporadic breast cancer is an important public health problem. This review evaluates current data on the clinical indications for CPM and long-term patient satisfaction and psychosocial outcomes. Gaps in knowledge about the clinical value of CPM, including patient- and physician-related psychosocial factors that influence the decision-making process of CPM among women with sporadic breast cancer, are highlighted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

Abenaa M. Brewster: None; Patricia A. Parker: None.

Section Editor Kathleen Pritchard discloses that she serves as a consultant for and receives honoraria from Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer.

Reviewer “A” discloses no financial relationships.

The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. On the basis of disclosed information, all conflicts of interest have been resolved.

References

    1. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–5209. - PubMed
    1. Lostumbo L, Carbine NE, Wallace J. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD002748. - PubMed
    1. Kollias J, Ellis IO, Elston CW, et al. Clinical and histological predictors of contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:584–589. - PubMed
    1. Robbins GF, Berg JW. Bilateral primary breast cancer: A prospective clinicopathological study. Cancer. 1964;17:1501–1527. - PubMed
    1. Healey EA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, et al. Contralateral breast cancer: Clinical characteristics and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:1545–1552. - PubMed

Publication types