XELOX vs FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: NO16966 updated results
- PMID: 21673685
- PMCID: PMC3137415
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.201
XELOX vs FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: NO16966 updated results
Abstract
Background: We report updated overall survival (OS) data from study NO16966, which compared capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) vs 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Methods: NO16966 was a randomised, two-arm, non-inferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX vs FOLFOX4, which was subsequently amended to a 2 × 2 factorial design with further randomisation to bevacizumab or placebo. A planned follow-up exploratory analysis of OS was performed.
Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 2034 patients (two-arm portion, n=634; 2 × 2 factorial portion, n=1400). For the whole NO16966 study population, median OS was 19.8 months in the pooled XELOX/XELOX-placebo/XELOX-bevacizumab arms vs 19.5 months in the pooled FOLFOX4/FOLFOX4-placebo/FOLFOX4-bevacizumab arms (hazard ratio 0.95 (97.5% CI 0.85-1.06)). In the pooled XELOX/XELOX-placebo arms, median OS was 19.0 vs 18.9 months in the pooled FOLFOX4/FOLFOX4-placebo arms (hazard ratio 0.95 (97.5% CI 0.83-1.09)). FOLFOX4 was associated with more grade 3/4 neutropenia/granulocytopenia and febrile neutropenia than XELOX, and XELOX with more grade 3 diarrhoea and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than FOLFOX4.
Conclusion: Updated survival data from study NO16966 show that XELOX is similar to FOLFOX4, confirming the primary analysis of progression-free survival. XELOX can be considered as a routine first-line treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Figures
References
-
- Arkenau HT, Arnold D, Cassidy J, Diaz-Rubio E, Douillard JY, Hochster H, Martoni A, Grothey A, Hinke A, Schmiegel W, Schmoll HJ, Porschen R (2008) Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine or infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26: 5910–5917 - PubMed
-
- Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, Koski S, Lichinitser M, Yang TS, Rivera F, Couture F, Sirzén F, Saltz L (2008a) A randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 2006–2012 - PubMed
-
- Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, Koski S, Sirzen F, Gilberg F, Saltz L (2008b) XELOX vs FOLFOX4: update of efficacy results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Presented at the ASCO GI Cancers Symposium: Orlando, Florida, USA, 25–27 January (abstract 341)
-
- Chu E, Schulman KL, Zelt S (2009) Costs associated with complications are lower with capecitabine than with 5-fluorouracil in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer 115: 1412–1423 - PubMed
-
- Comella P, Massidda B, Filippelli G, Farris A, Natale D, Barberis G, Maiorino L, Palmeri S, Condemi G, Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (2009) Randomised trial comparing biweekly oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine versus oxaliplatin plus i.v. bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology study 0401. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135: 217–226 - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
