Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;31(5):811-26.
doi: 10.1007/s10875-011-9549-z. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

A distinct role of CD4+ Th17- and Th17-stimulated CD8+ CTL in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Affiliations

A distinct role of CD4+ Th17- and Th17-stimulated CD8+ CTL in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Manjunatha Ankathatti Munegowda et al. J Clin Immunol. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Both CD4(+) Th17-cells and CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are involved in type 1 diabetes and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). However, their relationship in pathogenesis of these autoimmune diseases is still elusive. We generated ovalbumin (OVA)- or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-specific Th17 cells expressing RORγt and IL-17 by in vitro co-culturing OVA-pulsed and MOG(35-55) peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DC(OVA) and DC(MOG)) with CD4(+) T cells derived from transgenic OTII and MOG-T cell receptor mice, respectively. We found that these Th17 cells when transferred into C57BL/6 mice stimulated OVA- and MOG-specific CTL responses, respectively. To assess the above question, we adoptively transferred OVA-specific Th17 cells into transgenic rat insulin promoter (RIP)-mOVA mice or RIP-mOVA mice treated with anti-CD8 antibody to deplete Th17-stimulated CD8(+) T cells. We demonstrated that OVA-specific Th17-stimulated CTLs, but not Th17 cells themselves, induced diabetes in RIP-mOVA. We also transferred MOG-specific Th17 cells into C57BL/6 mice and H-2K(b-/-) mice lacking of the ability to generate Th17-stimulated CTLs. We further found that MOG-specific Th17 cells, but not Th17-activated CTLs induced EAE in C57BL/6 mice. Taken together, our data indicate a distinct role of Th17 cells and Th17-stimulated CTLs in the pathogenesis of TID and EAE, which may have great impact on the overall understanding of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Phenotypic characterization of OVA-specific CD4+ Th17 cells. a Naïve CD4+ T cells and DCOVA-activated CD4+ Th17 cells derived from OT II mice were stained with a panel of biotin-conjugated Abs (solid lines) followed by staining with FITC-conjugated avidin and analyzed by flow cytometry. Irrelevant isotype-matched biotin-conjugated Abs were used as controls (light dotted lines). b In vitro DCOVA-activated CD4+ Th1 and Th17 cells were double-stained with FITC-anti-IL-17 Ab and PE-anti-IFN-γ Ab, and analyzed by flow cytometry. c RNA extracted from DCOVA-activated CD4+ Th17 and Con A-stimulated CD4+ T (control) cells were analyzed by RT-PCR for expression of Th17 cell specific transcription factor ROR-γt. d Purified active CD4+ Th17 cells were stained with PE-anti-CD4 and FITC-anti-CD11c Abs and analyzed by flow cytometry. e CD4+ Th17 and (Kb−/−)Th17 cells were stained with FITC-anti-pMHC I antibody (solid lines) and irrelevant isotype-matched antibody was used as control (dotted lines). One representative experiment of two experiments is shown
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CD4+ Th17 cells induced CTL leads to diabetes in transgenic RIP-mOVA mice. a In vitro CD8+ T cell proliferation assay. Irradiated DCOVA, CD4+ Th17, CD4+ Th17 with anti-IL-2 Ab and (Kb−/−)Th17 cells, and their twofold dilutions were co-cultured with naïve OTI CD8+ T cells. After 2 days, the proliferative responses of CD8+ T cells were determined by overnight 3H-thymidine uptake assay. b In vitro cytotoxicity assay. Th17-activated OTI CD8+ Tc1 cells were used as effector (E) cells and in another experiment, Th17-activated CD8+ T cells with or without preincubation of concanamycin A (CMA, 1 μM) or emetin (5 μM) for 2 h were used as effector (E) cells, while 51Cr-labeled EG7 and EL4 cells were used as target (T) cells in a chromium release assay. c In tetramer staining assay, the tail blood samples and pancreatic lymph node cells of transgenic RIP-mOVA mice adoptively transferred with CD4+ Th17 cells, DCOVA, (Kb−/−)CD4+ Th17 cells, and PBS (controls) were stained with PE-H-2Kb/OVAI (PE-tetramer) and FITC-CD8 Ab (FITC-CD8), and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The values in each panel represent the percentage of tetramer-positive CD8+ Tcells versus the total CD8+ Tcell population. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation. In in vivo cytotoxicity assay, 16 h after target cell delivery, the residual OVAI-pulsed CFSEhigh and Mut1-pulsed CFSElow target cells remaining in the spleens of the above cohorts of mice were sorted and analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation; (n=6, average±SD), *p<0.05 versus cohorts of mice adoptively transferred with DCOVA (Student’s t test). d In tetramer staining assay, the tail blood samples of wild-type C57BL/6 and perforin−/− mice adoptively transferred with CD4+ Th17 cells were stained with PE-H-2Kb/OVAI (PE-tetramer) and FITC-CD8 Ab (FITC-CD8), and then analyzed by flow cytometry. In in vivo cytotoxicity assay, 16 h after target cell delivery, the residual OVAI-pulsed CFSEhigh and Mut1-pulsed CFSElow target cells remaining in the spleens of the above cohorts of mice were sorted and analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation; (n=6, average±SD), *p<0.05 versus cohorts of perforin−/− mice (Student’s t test). e Urine test for diabetes. Glucose levels in urine samples from transgenic RIP-mOVA mice adoptively transferred with irradiated CD4+ Th17 cells, DCOVA, (Kb−/−)CD4+ Th17 cells, and PBS (controls). The cutoff line of urine glucose concentration for diabetes is shown. f Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from Th17- and PBS-injected mice at higher magnification showing extensive cellular infiltration in Th17-injected mice compared to control. Magnifications, ×10 and ×20. One representative experiment of two in the above different experiments is shown
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MOG peptide immunization stimulate MOG-specific CTL responses and induce EAE. a Wild-type C57BL/6 and CD4+ T cell- or CD8+ T cell-deficient Iab and H-2Kb mice were immunized with MOG35-55 + CFA. C57BL/6 mice immunized with CFA only were used as control. Clinical EAE was scored according to 0–5 scale. The difference between C57BL/6 and CD4+ T cell-depleted mice (two asterisks) or CD8+ T cell-depleted C57BL/6 mice (single) is very significant (p<0.01) or significant (p<0.05; Mann–Whitney U test). b The tail blood samples of mice immunized with MOG peptide or OVAI peptide (control) were stained with PE-H-2Db/MOGI pentamer (PE-pentamer) and FITC-anti-CD8 Ab (FITC-CD8), and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in each panel represents the percentage of pentamer-positive CD8+ T cells versus the total CD8+ T cell population. c In in vivo cytotoxicity assay, 16 h after target cell delivery, the residual MOGI-pulsed CFSEhigh and Mut1-pulsed CFSElow target cells remaining in the spleens of the above immunized mice were sorted and analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation. d Photographs of sections of spinal cords derived from mice with EAE; tissue sections were stained with Luxol fast blue along with H&E counterstaining. Control mice (a and c) and MOG-immunized mice (b and d). Magnifications, ×5 (a and b) and ×20 (c and d). Inflammatory infiltration and demyelination are shown with arrows. e Mean scores of inflammation and demyelination±SD. *p<0.01 versus cohorts of the control groups (Student’s t test). One representative experiment of three in the above experiments is shown
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
In vitro-activated MOG-specific CD4+ MOG-TCR-Th17 cells stimulate MOG-specific CD8+ CTL responses and induce EAE. a Phenotypic analysis of MOG-specific CD4+ MOG-TCR-Th17 cells. MOG-specific CD4+ MOG-TCR-Th17 cells derived from transgenic MOG-TCR mice were stained with a panel of biotin-conjugated Abs (solid lines) followed by staining with FITC-conjugated avidin and analyzed by flow cytometry. Irrelevant isotype-matched biotin-conjugated Abs were used as controls (light dotted lines). b RNA extracted from MOG-specific CD4+ MOG-TCR-Th17 and Con A-stimulated CD4+ T (control) cells were analyzed by RT-PCR for assessment of expression of RORγt. c Pentamer staining assay. The tail blood samples of mice adaptively transferred with CD4+ MOG-TCR-Th17 cells or Con A-stimulated CD4+ T (control) cells were stained with PE-H-2Db/MOGI pentamer (PE-pentamer) and FITC-anti-CD8 Ab (FITC-CD8), and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in each panel represents the percentage of pentamer-positive CD8+ T cells versus the total CD8+ T cell population. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation. d In vivo cytotoxicity assay. Sixteen hours after target cell delivery, the residual MOGI-pulsed CFSEhigh and Mut1-pulsed CFSElow target cells remaining in the spleens of the above cohorts of mice were sorted and analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation. e Wild-type C57BL/6 mice were adoptively transferred with MOG-specific MOG-TCR-Th17 cells or OVA-specific Th17 cells (control). The clinical EAE was scored according to 0–5 scale. f Photographs of sections of spinal cords derived from mice with EAE; tissue sections were stained with Luxol fast blue along with H&E counterstaining. Control mice (a and c) and MOG-immunized mice (b and d). Magnifications, ×5 (a and b) and ×20 (c and d). Inflammatory infiltration and demyelination are shown with arrows. g Mean scores of inflammation and demyelination±SD. *p<0.01 versus cohorts of the control groups (Student’s t test). One representative experiment of three in the above experiments is shown
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
In vivo-generated MOG-specific CD4+ Th17 cells stimulate MOG-specific CD8+ CTL responses and induce EAE. a Phenotypic analysis of in vivo-generated MOG-specific CD4+ Th17 cells. MOG-specific CD4+ Th17 cells derived from MOG peptide-immunized mice with EAE and expanded in vitro by co-culturing with MOG peptide-pulsed splenocytes were stained with a panel of biotin-conjugated Abs (solid lines) followed by staining with FITC-conjugated avidin and analyzed by flow cytometry. Irrelevant isotype-matched biotin-conjugated Abs were used as controls (light dotted lines). b RNA extracted from MOG-specific CD4+ Th17 and Con A-stimulated CD4+ T (control) cells were analyzed by RT-PCR for assessment of expression of RORγt. c Pentamer staining assay. The tail blood samples of mice adoptively transferred with CD4+ Th17 cells or Con A-stimulated CD4+ T (control) cells were stained with PE-H-2Db/MOGI pentamer (PE-pentamer) and FITC-anti-CD8 Ab (FITC-CD8), and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in each panel represents the percentage of pentamer-positive CD8+ T cells versus the total CD8+ T cell population. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation. d In vivo cytotoxicity assay. Sixteen hours after target cell delivery, the residual MOGI-pulsed CFSEhigh and Mut1-pulsed CFSElow target cells remaining in the spleens of the above cohorts of mice were sorted and analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in parenthesis represents the standard deviation. e Wild-type C57BL/6 mice were adoptively transferred with MOG-specific Th17 cells or OVA-specific Th17 cells (control). The clinical EAE was scored according to 0–5 scale. f Photographs of sections of spinal cords derived from mice with EAE; tissue sections were stained with Luxol fast blue along with H&E counterstaining. Control mice (a and c) and MOG-immunized mice (b and d). Magnifications, ×5 (a and b) and ×20 (c and d). Inflammatory infiltration and demyelination are shown with arrows. g Mean scores of inflammation and demyelination±SD. *p<0.01 versus cohorts of the control groups (Student’s t test). One representative experiment of three in the above experiments is shown
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Distinct role of CD4+ Th17- and Th17-stimulated CD8+ CTL in pathogenesis of T1D and EAE. Both CD4+ Th17 cells and Th17-stimulated CD8+ CTLs are involved in pathogenesis of T1D and EAE. However, T1D is directly mediated by Th17-stimulated CD8+ CTLs to destroy OVA-expressing pancreatic islets of RIP-mOVA mice via perforin-mediated cytotoxicity. On the contrary, CD4+ Th17 cells play a major role in pathogenesis of EAE by Th17 cytokine-mediated tissue inflammation leading to demyelination in the central nervous system

References

    1. Dong C. TH17 cells in development: an updated view of their molecular identity and genetic programming. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:337–48. - PubMed
    1. Weaver CT, Harrington LE, Mangan PR, Gavrieli M, Murphy KM. Th17: an effector CD4 T cell lineage with regulatory T cell ties. Immunity. 2006;24:677–88. - PubMed
    1. Bettelli E, Korn T, Kuchroo VK. Th17: the third member of the effector T cell trilogy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:652–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinman L. A brief history of T(H)17, the first major revision in the T(H)1/T(H)2 hypothesis of T cell-mediated tissue damage. Nat Med. 2007;13:139–45. - PubMed
    1. Ivanov II, McKenzie BS, Zhou L, Tadokoro CE, Lepelley A, Lafaille JJ, et al. The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell. 2006;126:1121–33. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms